Figured some people might be interested.![]()
-
Attached Files:
-
-
Computer technology never seems to slow down progressing.
-
Disappointing. Thread title had me thinking someone had a computer with 40 CPUs and 23 GPUs all running at once.
-
-
-
The Forerunner Notebook Virtuoso
Huh. Not bad considering my overclocked 8600 gets a bit over a 1000.
-
The spread between GPU's seems a bit higher than in 3dmark06 though. In '06, the difference between the 8400 GS and 8600 GT was a factor of 2.5. In '08, it's a factor of 5. Maybe it's just because I'm comparing the mobile versions in the '06 and desktop versions in '08, but even so the gaps between different classes of GPU's seem larger in '08 than I'm used to in '06.
CPU score is 5-20%, right? So even with a horrible GPU, a system with 40 CPU's ought to deliver a pretty awesome, if somewhat misleading, score. -
-
I was thinking the same as well.
Atleast we've pretty graphs to stare at though. -
74593275 -
maybe I should delete the thread?
-
No, it's a good thread... I was just REALLY looking forward to seeing one of these running Crysis.
-
)
-
That 4Ghz Core 2 Duo extreme processor is a monster
-
Mheh, the title was misleading...but I can get past that.
It`s funny that the 9800 GTX has a minor improvement over the 8800 GTX, albeit a small one, and the 9800GX2 SLI show about 3 times the score of the 8800 GTX.
So SLI = crap, again... -
I think its a core 2 quad? not sure though. Cant imagine a core 2 duo scoring that high
-
misleading title, post with results but no analysis. Where are 40 CPU's and 23 GPU's? explain!!!
*damn cant give negative rep* -
Lol,you people have no sense of subtlety.
As Nirvana said, this is the best way to get people to read the topic and post
However , I don`t see anyone else interpretating those GX2 SLI results as oposed to a single 8800 GTX..
40 CPUs+23 GPUs in 3dmark Vantage
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Nirvana, May 13, 2008.