Do you guys think 60fps is worth the graphic trade off? It appears that in order to get a solid 60fps on some cards, you have to decrease certain graphical options. IYO, Is the trade off worth it? Is there a happy medium - for example; 45fps. Discuss
-
Getawayfrommelucas Notebook Evangelist
-
But on some genres like slower paced RTS or general strategy games, even 30 fps feel at home, because decisions are much more relevant than twitch reaction.
Fighting games definitely require high fps too. -
Getawayfrommelucas Notebook Evangelist
-
-
Games that rely in atmosphere and are not very fast paced, are best enjoyed with high quality sound and graphics even if you have sub 60 fps. But games like battlefield and Call of duty, you might be complaining much more than enjoying the game when playing under 60fps. Regardless of how good they look hahaha.D2 Ultima and Getawayfrommelucas like this. -
I mainly play FPS, so I will lower graphics settings as needed to obtain 60 FPS if not higher since I've overclocked my display to 100 Hz and see real benefit to higher frame rates.
Witcher 2 is the only game where I've deliberately sacrificed 60 FPS for better visuals because it's so darn pretty. I play it with an Xbox 360 controller and probably average around 45 FPS at 1080p Ultra w/o Ubersampling. The SLI microstutter is pretty annoying below 40 FPS and combat loses some of its fluidity and responsiveness.
PlanetSide 2 is a game where it's basically impossible to keep a 60 FPS minimum, no matter how powerful your hardware is, because the game and engine is just so poorly optimized. It's CPU-bottlenecked, hitches, and leaks memory like crazy.
60fps - the trade off
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Getawayfrommelucas, Oct 7, 2014.