Yo everyone this is my first post i recently bought a laptop for about 1000 which is my price range here are the config : amd dual 1.9 ghz, 2gb ram, nvidia 7000m, vista
i read a review by pulp about the 7150m and was wondering what the difference was between the 7150m and 7000m and if i could use this card to play games like fear, pro evo 6, nfs most wanted etc or is the card not good enough
thanks
-
-
Doubtful, and if you could, you would need to set ALL of the settings to the lowest.
-
If you can still return it, do it now, and get a computer with at least an 8400m GS.
-
harpreet beat me to it. $1000 for that setup is way to much. For a grand you can get a M1530 off the outlet no problem.
-
you can easily get a fully loaded Dell Vostro 1500 w/ 8600M GT for around $700.
or even Vostro 1700
Check the Dell Outlet as well. -
or an Acer Aspire 5920...
http://www.compusa.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3528111&CatId=2289 -
they are identical, 7150 is pretty much a refresh of 7000. and they are the crappiest card you can find on the market.
-
Yeah the 7150 and 7000 are pretty much the second worst cards ever made. Gaming would be impossible. -
thats 950 australian
so what u people are trying to tell me is that i cant play n e games or i cant play n e new games because the review by pulp that i read said that i could play fear fine not to mention pro evo -
not only games but you might also unable to play HD-videos.
-
lol so i cant play n e games at all
-
No games, period. -
i think you people are overreacting ill try installing some games and then ill get back to you thanks for the help
-
lol isn't the 7150M not much better (not much better at ALLLLL) than the Intel X3100?
You could probably play a few games here and there, but literally on the lowest resoulutions (640x480) and lowest settings possible. And at that it might be very choppy. -
you can PLAY the games, but at the LOWEST resolution and LOWEST setting, and even then it won't be pleasurable.
-
Basically just not enjoyable gaming, yet posisble.
-
ive installed nfs carbon and neverwinter nights 2 and they work fine i can play carbon on the highest resolution with med detail as for fear that to runs without n e probs, so i really dont know why u people keep dissing this card when its alright for casual gaming, obviously i cant play cyrsis but then again you tell me who can play that game on a notebook
-
Please post some screen shots! You may have the Prophet of IGP's.
Seriously though, download fraps, and show us some screens of you running NFS at the "highest resolution". And F.E.A.R... yeah, I can't wait to see those screen shots. -
i dont have the internet at home just at work, and wtf is fraps , the highest resolution being 1024 x another number cant remember which one, tell me how to take screenshots and ill do it, ive got no reason to lie to you
-
Not saying you were lying.
Just Google "Fraps" and download it. Run the program while running the game, (background), and take some screenshots. I believe the default screenshot key is F10, but not for sure. It will show your framerate, so we can see how playable it really is. -
I wouldn´t say he´s lying, I´ve got a similar setup and I play Pro Evolution Soccer 6, 800 x 600 at med detail and it runs pretty smooth. Rome Total War runs on med at 1024 x 768 also. It´s a mixed bag, some games feels more optimized for nvidia graphics so they run better than others. Games 2005 and forward is a little out of question though
7000m compared to 7150m
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by tinkica1000, Jun 11, 2008.