The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    7600 gaming with 1680 x 1050 rseolution

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by lesquatter, Mar 1, 2007.

  1. lesquatter

    lesquatter Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The laptop that I am looking at is a higher res 1680 x 1050 screen with a 512mb 7600 card. Now when matched with the 7600 how have people found games to look on higher resolutions? Have you had to reduce the native res...does this look okay? Or have you decreased detail etc? Or does high detail + the high resolution work?

    Any advise/experience welcome
     
  2. vespoli

    vespoli 402 NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,134
    Messages:
    3,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Depending on what games you play, what settings/FPS you like to have you may need to either turn down the settings, decrease the res, or do both.

    The 7600 is a good card, but WSXGA+ is a pretty high res. to drive. It's not usually a big deal to run at a non-native resolution while gaming...it's one of the few things that don't look bad running non-natively.
     
  3. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I usually game at 1280 x 800 on my WSXGA+ machine...no problems with Oblivion (and that's just about the most demanding game out there) on medium-high settings.
     
  4. eeekoi13

    eeekoi13 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    88
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    On newer games, I doubt that the 7600 can handle that resolution. I don't even think that the 7600 is capable of utilizing 512 mb of vram. But those specs would definitely be excellent for watching movies, video clips, and the likes.
     
  5. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    I play at 1280x800. It'll handle FEAR with no AA, and mid to high details at that res. I wouldn't count on anything but previous-generation games running well at that resolution. Quake4/FEAR/Oblivion and newer will need to have details set way down to run at that res.

    On the bright side, I've found that aspect-ratio preserving scaling on an LCD is a very good thing, and doesn't bother me nearly as much as the "stretched" look that used to happen when you put a 4:3 res on a 16:9 screen.
     
  6. TwilightVampire

    TwilightVampire Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    362
    Messages:
    1,376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I can go 1680x1050 on my little x700 with decent graphic settings without slowing it down too much. A 7600 should do it great.
     
  7. HavoK

    HavoK Registered User

    Reputations:
    706
    Messages:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    A 7600 cannot drive new games at that resolution. Unless you turn down the settings. For example, at high settings, even an 8800GTS 320mb is hard pressed running Company of Heroes at 1680 x 1050.

    Maybe try for a 7700, or failing that, you'll have to run most games at lower resolution (again, unless you don't mind turning the settings down, but to be honest I'd rather a smaller res and higher settings then high res and low settings)
     
  8. csinth

    csinth Snitch?

    Reputations:
    181
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I run CS: Source 1680x1050, a great looking game, with good fps at highish settings. Good is usually between 40 and 60, but in HDR lighting levels it usually drops between 30 and 40, though it still looks smooth.
     
  9. Lil Mayz

    Lil Mayz Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    599
    Messages:
    1,463
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I run Counter-Strike: Source at 1600 x 1200, all detail settings on minimum and AA/AF off.

    Your GPU will handle 1680 x 1050 easily, as long as your screen is good enough, but maximum, native screen resolutions, with lower detail settings still looks fantastic. There is no point in increasing Image quality and taking away pixels.
     
  10. Charles P. Jefferies

    Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    22,339
    Messages:
    36,639
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    Trophy Points:
    931
  11. lesquatter

    lesquatter Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    cheers guys....so if I did decide to turn down the res on that screen to say 1440x900 or 1280x800 for certain games....do these higher res screens look a lot worse than a screen with these native settings? Secondly will DVD's, video files etc look good on this resoultion....cos I know the res is highre than DVD can play for example?
     
  12. HavoK

    HavoK Registered User

    Reputations:
    706
    Messages:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    No, because with the resolution lowered you'll be able to turn on effects and details you wouldn't be able to turn on at 1680x1050.

    I play all my games at 1024x768 on my notebook for such reasons, even though it goes up to 1280x960.
     
  13. l33t_c0w

    l33t_c0w Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    174
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    On a positive note, on my HEL80 at least, I don't notice the difference between 1280x800 and 1680x1050 playing Oblivion.
     
  14. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Just make sure you scale preserving the aspect ratio, and you should be fine. I can't remember what the setting is since I'm on the work laptop (ATI), but with it enabled, even 800x600 looks ok on my personal machine.
     
  15. MaxBerry

    MaxBerry Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    i have external 15" monitor which has 1024x768 resolution, i think it will play games better on that resolution?
     
  16. chrisyano

    chrisyano Hall Monitor NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    956
    Messages:
    5,504
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I haven't had a chance to try out many of the newer games, but gaming at WSXGA+ with my go 7600 is fine at stock settings (350/350). Most 7600's are set higher than that so you should do fine. As noted, however, newer games are more demanding so it is quite likely that you would have to lower the resolution to handle them at faster FPS. Most who do so do not have many complaints about it looking bad.

    I can get good framerates on games like BatteFront II and Far Cry (but they are rather dated at this point) and overclocking does give a little framerate boost at WSXGA+. Something like UT2004 gets ridiculously high FPS at max settings--but it's not that demanding.
     
  17. Keizafk

    Keizafk Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    75
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Strange enough, Jade Empire's been running fairly nice so far with 1680x1050, with the signed setup. Maybe it'll eventually start lagging!
     
  18. HavoK

    HavoK Registered User

    Reputations:
    706
    Messages:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    That's not really strange - it's not a demanding game. Try running something like Oblivion or FEAR at that res and see what happens!