I realize a single GTX 980M won't cut it at 4K in current games but what about older ones, circa 2009-2012? It would be nice to have the boost in resolution but still have a "perfect" scaled fallback at 1080p for the games that can't manage it. Thoughts/insights/snarky comments?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate
-
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
Last edited: Feb 10, 2016killkenny1 likes this. -
depending on the title it runs some games very well at 4k resolution, but as SRSR333 said it really depends on the demands of the game, you can always compromise, i run a lot of my games at 2048x1152.
-
If you are willing to just do some OC just on the stock vbios, you can think of it as a 970 with functional 8gb of VRAM.
-
-
saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate
It actually doesn't matter for me now. I went to a local store to look at 2K and 4K monitors, including several G-Sync ones. When scaled down to anything other than their native resolutions, they looked pretty awful. I'll be sticking with 1080p for the foreseeable future.
Ethrem likes this. -
Id be lying if I said I didn't miss 1200p though. Things just looked better at 16:10 IMO. My M17xR1 had a very nice screen indeed.Kade Storm and D2 Ultima like this. -
saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate
16:10 is one thing Apple will always have in its favor, though I will admit I am intrigued by the Surface Book. If it had a more powerful GPU, I would very well have considered it. -
You can handle most older titles at 4K without much issue on a single 980M. The difference between late 2013 & onward and early 2013 & prior titles is rather large in terms of unoptimization levels. I don't know whether to blame Maxwell's GPU line, the current-gen consoles, or both.i_pk_pjers_i and Kade Storm like this.
980M and 4K gaming with older titles
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by saturnotaku, Feb 9, 2016.