The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    AMD New Horizon Event

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Talon, Dec 13, 2016.

  1. Talon

    Talon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,482
    Messages:
    3,519
    Likes Received:
    4,695
    Trophy Points:
    331
  2. ChowMeow

    ChowMeow Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    67
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    56
    It's gonna be lit
     
  3. Deks

    Deks Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,272
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    331
  4. Hurik

    Hurik Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    159
    Trophy Points:
    66
    triturbo likes this.
  5. Deks

    Deks Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,272
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    331
    I'd prefer a 6 core CPU in the mobile space... or maybe even 8 core on AMD's end.
    It could be done... if they lower the clock speeds to say 3 GhZ (base) and have a Polaris based IGP with HBM 2.

    Though I'd love to see Ryzen CPU (6 or 8 core with 12 or 16 threads) and E9550.
    That would definitely be a win if you ask me.

    I could finally upgrade my ancient Acer. :D
     
    Hurik and triturbo like this.
  6. triturbo

    triturbo Long live 16:10 and MXM-B

    Reputations:
    1,577
    Messages:
    3,845
    Likes Received:
    1,239
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Ryzen + Vega :D AMD is definitely back. Now if only these crappy laptop ODMs/OEMs put them non-crippled in their non-crippled machines, that would be GREAT! Well even if they don't, it's desktop for me, so screw you "enthusiast" "manufacturers".
     
  7. Hurik

    Hurik Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    159
    Trophy Points:
    66
    I think Intel has reached its limit with efficiency. I could have never imagined Intel mobile CPUs to be as bad as they're now in terms of throttling and overheating. Wherever you look in the reviews, you'll see that even severely crippled 6700hqs have much worse thermals than even full-blown GPUs from Nvidia. And this is all with year-to-year microscopic IPC improvements. AMD has to rise again and end this joke.
     
  8. keftih

    keftih Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    87
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Thermals are mainly the fault of the notebook manufacturers. It is not difficult to cool a 6700HQ, but some manufacturers simply choose not too in the pursuit of thin, light, and throttling notebooks. That being said, the 6700HQ simply has pitiful clock speeds even when properly cooled. 3.1 GHz for 4-core boost is shameful in 2016 and really makes you wonder if 6700HQs are truly bottom of the bin.

    If the numbers are accurate, Ryzen efficiency is insane. If 8c/16t is at 95W, 6c/12t should easily fit into notebooks.
     
  9. ryzeki

    ryzeki Super Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    6,547
    Messages:
    6,410
    Likes Received:
    4,085
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Hell, even 95W can fit on notebooks. We already power 200w 1080 GPUs, and intel's 6820HK already hovers on the 80w when overclocked hard and pushed to 100% usage, which is not much of a problem to cool with proper cooling.

    But yeah, a good high clocked 6 core CPU would be great.
     
    custom90gt likes this.
  10. Talon

    Talon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,482
    Messages:
    3,519
    Likes Received:
    4,695
    Trophy Points:
    331
    6700HQ is truly bottle of the bin, the left overs that Intel needed to sell. There is no reason why in 2016 we have mobile quad core i7s with clock speeds lower than years past. At least when I have my 4700mq and 4900mq chips I could overclock a bit with the few unlocked turbo bins. I won't be surprised at all if Intel does the same crap with Kaby Lake and fully locks down the HQ chips.

    AMD didn't show the single core IPC, but the multithreaded results are promising for sure. I am hoping that AMD puts a hurting on Intel and drives innovation and progress.
     
    TomJGX likes this.