Now that we know AMD will be in every next gen console will AMD GPU's be better optimized to perform on PC games?
Thoughts?
-
Probably not too much. With the consoles having native access to hardware and a unified memory architecture the differences are still rather significant.
Most ports will be written using Direct3D and OpenGL APIs. I doubt most companies would include GCN ISA in a PC port when the engine they are running on (usually) supports OpenGL or Direct3D without much effort required. Especially since they'd still need one of those two for it to run on Intel and nVidia cards. -
AMD's GPU's are already optimized pretty well. The memory manager has been worked on therefore frame latencies have lowered, the cards were generally pretty stable and the main issues were more on the Enduro/Crossfire thing.
But I do expect we'll be seeing massively more optimized games due to the similar modern GPU architectures but much more importantly, due to the x86 CPU architecture used.
Still, the massive memory bandwidth available in the console as opposed to PC's (around 160GB/s vs ~20-30GB/s) may influence things significantly. -
-
So no advantage of new console to PC ports having all AMD GPU's?
I know games are made with PC's but for some reason I was thinking AMD would have a leg up on nVidia just because they used AMD parts. -
-
Quagmire LXIX Have Laptop, Will Travel!
Things could be worse, Goldman Sucks could be using you...oh wait! All these corporations in many fields with their 'admitted no wrongdoing, yet agreed to pay fines' crap is out of control. Wheels on the bus go round & round...
AMD better position for PC/Console ports?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by IKAS V, May 13, 2013.