The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    APU vs CPU/GPU Combo

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by TheBluePill, Mar 6, 2012.

  1. TheBluePill

    TheBluePill Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    636
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  2. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    The problem is if you want to scale to any faster than that. Memory bandwidth will rear it's head and eat you.

    Even the 6670 (which should have GDDR5 btw and not DDR3) gets a boost from using GDDR5.
     
  3. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    6670 comes in both DDR3 and GDDR5 variants. I agree that GDDR5 will make a significant improvement, but you can't deny the fact that the IGP can perform as good as an upper low end or low end mid range discrete GPU at 1366x768 or lower res. Where the discrete GPU's will do better is with higher resolutions, however.
     
  4. CrAzYsIm

    CrAzYsIm Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I just built my uncle a budget PC where he can run dual monitors while keeping costs down and I went with an AMD A6 APU. Does the job well and was <$100 for a CPU/GPU combo
     
  5. Bullit

    Bullit Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    122
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    31
    They don't put an OpenGL benchmark.
     
  6. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    OpenGL is not used much at all any more, at least nothing that requires much GPU horsepower. Rage was the latest game, otherwise most other stuff is much older or low performance requirement.
     
  7. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    it's a stretch to say it isn't used for anything at all when it dominates the non-gaming graphics industry, and is widely used in non-AAA game titles as well. It's only occasionally used in AAA windows games. That is true.

    Obviously, games is a huge industry, but there are a LOT of people using OpenGL.
     
  8. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I didn't say it wasn't used at all, did I? This thread is in the gaming section so assuming the reference is to games, not other applications. As well as most of the benchmarks in that link were games. It is used in many indie titles, but performance isn't of importance there usually, since system requirements are typically quite meager.

    Adobe apps along with many 3D modeling engines use it like Maya and Blender, but that isn't the topic.
     
  9. saturnotaku

    saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,879
    Messages:
    8,926
    Likes Received:
    4,707
    Trophy Points:
    431
    And those people are typically using Quadro and FirePro GPUs, which aren't in the same league as what's being discussed here.
     
  10. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Yeah, I don't think you'd be using an integrated GPU for rendering Maya, lol.