The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    ASUS XG Station And ATI XGP

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Dienekes, Jun 18, 2008.

  1. Dienekes

    Dienekes Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    its been over a year since the XG Station was announced

    and not long since ATI announced theres.

    anybody have any idea when either of these will actually be released?, because the XG station is over a year late, and the XGP doesnt have any release date aside from its being released with the "Fujitsu's AMILO Sa 3650"

    and that has no release date at all

    and im deffo planning on going with either of these, because i love stupidly powerful systems.

    has anybody heard anything, or know anything about either of them? obviously the ATI one will probably be out this year, but maybe it will vanish like the XG did.
     
  2. Nirvana

    Nirvana Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,200
    Messages:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    take a look at my sig. that one is already out.
     
  3. Hoy

    Hoy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    65
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    With mid and low end GPU's and DDR2, These are not in the same league as the XGP which in the case of the Fujitsu Amilo and the XGP model on AMD's website, which sports a full 3870.
     
  4. Concr3te

    Concr3te Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Can you use one of these in combination with an already fast, dedicated card, like a 9800 to get even more frames?
     
  5. Harleyquin07

    Harleyquin07 エミヤ

    Reputations:
    603
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    116
    No, PC just uses the more powerful card since there is no interface allowing the external and internal cards to work together.
     
  6. lunateck

    lunateck Bananaed

    Reputations:
    527
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    No.. but AMD promised that you could do that in the future.. with ATI cards
     
  7. Mr._Kubelwagen

    Mr._Kubelwagen More machine now than man

    Reputations:
    398
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Look, I hate to burst your bubble, but don't be expecting too much out of external graphics card solutions. The expresscard interface may be fast, but it has nowhere near the bandwidth required to fully use anything above a GeForce 7300. While you can put any pci-express card in it, anything mid to high end will be severely crippled by interface bandwidth.
     
  8. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Yes they said their next platform will have a PCI-E 16x bandwidth-like port for a station that will give you full speed. It's gonna be pretty nice
     
  9. Hoy

    Hoy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    65
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Perhaps you haven't been doing much reading:

    http://ati.amd.com/technology/xgp/xgp_technology_brief.pdf

    XGP currently uses 8 lanes PCI-E 2.0 which is enough to run a 3870X2 with between 0-5% difference between 16 lane PCI-E 2.0

    Keep in mind that PCI-E 2.0 has twice the bandwidth of PCI-E 1.1, so the PCI-E 2.0 8 Lane bandwidth of the XGP port is the same as a PCI-E 1.1 16x slot.

    For that reason, a 3870, 3870x2, and perhaps even a 4850, 4870, and 4870x2 could be used in the XGP port without seeing any noticeable slowdown (at least not detectable without benchmarks.)

    XGP is a viable solution for laptop mid-high end graphics.
     
  10. lunateck

    lunateck Bananaed

    Reputations:
    527
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    XGP use a custom slot or port. It's not the standard PCIexpress slot that (i think) he was referring to.
     
  11. fifafreak18

    fifafreak18 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    188
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    TC im curious as to what you need it for, unless you have a different laptop not listed in your sig
     
  12. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    The XGP requires you to have a puma laptop with a special slot. What he's been refering to are connected through an USB port
     
  13. Hoy

    Hoy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    65
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Okay, well that's nice that everyone is coming to his defense. I wasn't trying to pick a fight.

    I noticed he said:
    If he meant only external graphics solutions utilizing the USB or expresscard slot, than he is right.

    However this thread is about XGP/other proprietary methods.

    Again, not trying to step on toes, but his response was to the original poster, who was inquiring about specialized proprietary slots for graphics, like the XGP. While AMD has the exclusive license on XGP for the first year, it certainly doesn't rule out other manufacturers using the port after that time.

    If it proves to be something that can find an upgrade path like USB (which will soon move into 3.0 spec), and be backwards compatible (say they are able to get a full 16 lanes pci-e 2.0 in the future), than there is a chance that it could become viable.

    However I have no trouble admitting that what is possible is not always probable.

    Until then, I have no qualms about buying a Fujitsu Sa 3650 or similar 12.1" or 13.3" notebook with this port (if a manufacturer would hurry up and come out with it already).