The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    ATI 5870M CF > 480M. Cheaper Too.

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by rschauby, Aug 27, 2010.

  1. rschauby

    rschauby Superfluously Redundant

    Reputations:
    865
    Messages:
    1,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Eurocom Test

    Well, Eurocom has tested their new Leopard 18.4" notebook in two different configurations: ATI 5870M in CrossFire vs an Nvidia 480M. Guess which configuration is cheaper.

    To boot, Eurocom claims it's easier to cool (2) 5870's compared to a single 480M.
     
  2. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Not surprising that the Crossfire won, though I would have thought the Crossfire would have done far better on 3DMark06 compared to the GTX 480M. Also, the test uses TDP as a measure of power consumption, which is a terrible determinant, when they easily have access to batteries and can measure power draw on idle and load. If this is the full review, then no game testing is a big fail...
     
  3. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Yeah. I'd love to see a test with a Kill-A-Watt or something inline measuring the current.
     
  4. rschauby

    rschauby Superfluously Redundant

    Reputations:
    865
    Messages:
    1,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I'm looking for a better review from Eurocom's site, will link it if I come across it. But yes, 17% advantage is kinda bleh. I think I'd almost be more willing to stick with a single GPU and avoid the dual GPU complexity.
     
  5. Baka

    Baka (・ω・)

    Reputations:
    2,228
    Messages:
    2,111
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    56
    17% advantage with crossfire but then again you can't really trust dual GPUs to run perfectly on your games. Artifacts tend to happen just because the games doesn't support dual GPUs until later patches usually ._.
     
  6. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Ehh... I've got dual 4670's in my desktop, and they've seemed to perform great in all my games. Haven't noticed any weirdness. But I haven't had that machine on for a few months now because we're remodeling.
     
  7. Baka

    Baka (・ω・)

    Reputations:
    2,228
    Messages:
    2,111
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I used to get some artifacts on Dawn of War 2's main screen with dual GPU enabled :( Also happened for Company of Heroes. They work just fine on single GPU though ._.

    The problem's fixed now though :D But I still don't exactly trust multi-GPU for now. I'd rather go for a single strong GPU
     
  8. Aikimox

    Aikimox Weihenstephaner!

    Reputations:
    5,955
    Messages:
    10,196
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    466
    It's Eurocom, guys. False Alarm....
     
  9. Kevin

    Kevin Egregious

    Reputations:
    3,289
    Messages:
    10,780
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I cant believe Fudzilla posted such an article on such a flimsy measurement.

    That said, if you're going with an X8100, it would be silly to choose the 480M over the CF 5870. Don't buy something that monstrous with a single, more expensive GPU.
     
  10. FXi

    FXi Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    345
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    130
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Again 300W "can" run a desktop chipset, a desktop I7 CPU and 2 480M's.

    While it's fishy to use TDP's as power consumption, it's even more fishy to not even have given the performance of a single 5870 to compare with on the same machine. Oh well. There will be more 480M sli machines in the future I suspect. And cutting them to 1-1.5Gb of memory will help both the TDP and the power consumption.

    Not putting much stock in the Eurocom tests...
     
  11. nobodyshero

    nobodyshero Notebook Speculator

    Reputations:
    511
    Messages:
    879
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Sighface TT...

    When are we going to kill 3dmark06 already? Although 5870x2 being better is hardly surprising for anyone in the know, would've much preferred some Vantage GPU score comparison.
     
  12. bks1987

    bks1987 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    369
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I don't understand the point of comparing two cards. they are both great and one is better than the other by what a few frame rate in terms of gaming? I don't know that much about graphics but this is my opinion.
     
  13. sean473

    sean473 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    this has to be the worst article from fudzilla ever.. seriously , the comparison is so flawed but idk as long as ATI tops..
     
  14. Xonar

    Xonar Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,457
    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    56
    It's a blog, get over it guys. Of course they're going to be grabbing for anything that ''looks'' interesting. They aren't held to the same level of credibility as mainstream medians -- bloggers aren't considered journalists.
     
  15. rschauby

    rschauby Superfluously Redundant

    Reputations:
    865
    Messages:
    1,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Regardless of how poor the reporting was and how uninformative the Eurocom tests were, I don't think anything was too surprising. No one doubts that 2 5870's can best a single 480M, and we all know the Nvidia card is expensive. I'm more disappointed we didn't get a good, detailed set of tests and measurements we can dig through. It hasn't exactly been easy to compare these 2 cards; we've all figured out that whichever GPU gets matched with an i7 980x desktop CPU will smoke the other one stuck running an i720QM.
     
  16. physib

    physib Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    231
    Messages:
    583
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  17. rschauby

    rschauby Superfluously Redundant

    Reputations:
    865
    Messages:
    1,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  18. Purlpo

    Purlpo Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    620
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yes. This. I wonder why is Eurocom so popular with tech websites and the like? You rarely see features involving Sager or something else.
     
  19. crash

    crash NBR Assassin

    Reputations:
    2,221
    Messages:
    5,540
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Because Eurocom can be very sensationalist and that makes for good blog writing ;)
     
  20. Alexrose1uk

    Alexrose1uk Music, Media, Game

    Reputations:
    616
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I've got an x8100 with crossfire 5870s coming in what should be the next week.
    Providing nothing goes wrong I'll be providing benchmarks so you can guage performance yourself from the setup, which will hopefully be a bit more indicative of real world performance than 3dmark06! (Simply compare against any 480m results) If any of you saw my Alienware 4850m crossfire M17 thread, you should know what to expect :)
     
  21. FXi

    FXi Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    345
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    130
    Trophy Points:
    81
    The pricing issue could also be impacted by supply and demand right now as well. Keep that in mind. Given the long lead times of 48xM equipped devices, it's probable that the supply is thin and thus it goes to the highest bidders, which drives up price.

    Not saying Nvidia doesn't need to get back down to planet earth in regards to pricing (compared to performance and compared to competition), but I think there might be some contributing factors is all.

    Alex, if you give some performance figures of 5870 single GPU for folks to compare to the 480M, we can already extrapolate the CF vs SLI differences. I think most folks were thinking that comparing CF to a single GPU, while interesting for those wondering what they might have to give up to go with a single GPU solution, was more of a "what CF is faster than a single GPU? No kidding!" kind of thing. The testing simply confirmed the obvious without giving a like to like measurement. It was done as a power consumption level comparison, but even that wasn't equal between the two.

    But I have liked your testing very much in the past, so please do more as we eat up data and figures around here like we were starving :)
     
  22. Alexrose1uk

    Alexrose1uk Music, Media, Game

    Reputations:
    616
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Haha, yeah without the cash to drop on a X7200 to swap in and out both sets of cards on the same mobo/cpu, its quite hard to get a direct comparison.

    Still, my x8100 benchmarks will definately be coming, I'm pretty sure I still have the same set of benchmark software I used for the 4850m suite, on one of my external drives, and Im quite happy to get hold of any additional free benchmarks people want done.
    For single card comparison, then some of the single card Clevo models would probably provide a better direct comparison, although I might look to do a small number, dependant on time available.