ATI is preparing something else now...check it out here http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5304242#post5304242
ATI 5000HD
-
Check this out:
Post #13
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=419540&page=2 -
Damn, looks like there is going to be an IGP that's actually better than my 3650. That's pretty sad.
-
Doubtful that the notebook version of the HD 4200 will come close to the HD 3650, especially at higher resolutions.
-
I certainly hope so.
-
Supposedly it is 15% better than the 9400M G, so do the math.
How does the 9400M G performs against the 3650HD, and then add a 15% to that result, and yo should get an estimated performance -
Seems that it's fairly close competition then. The 9500M GS is a little better (20% maybe?) than the 9400M G, and the 3650 is equivalent to the 9500M GS.
-
So it would be (theoretically speaking) somewhere between 10-5% lower, on normal resultions.
I wonder if the 5200HD is coming out any time... -
The HD 3650 GDDR3 is a bit better than even the the 9500M GS GDDR3 (which is a rebranded 8600M GT, though most are DDR2) in games. In medium-higher resolutions especially, the 128-bit bus and discrete memory sets itself apart from the 64-bit and integrated memory of the HD 4200.
-
LOL. Intel hasn't made a graphics chipset that was worth anything fo 3D yet, I'm not holding my breath. I would have to physically witness any graphics chip from Intel playing a game at a worthwhile resolution to believe they have made a real advancement. Even if they make a decent part, their drivers are so bad that the chip wouldn't be able to play anything anyway.
Don't kid yourself; when people are interested in getting a graphics chip (even an IGP) from nvidia or ATI, they are getting it to play games. To think that Intel is anywhere near those two in 3D graphics performance is a joke.
ATI is readying the 4200HD IGP
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Serg, Jul 29, 2009.