The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    ATI mobility HD 5730: benchmark review

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by lozanogo, Mar 25, 2010.

  1. lozanogo

    lozanogo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Hi guys, recently I bought the ASUS N61JA-JX056V and I decided to make a review benchmark for its graphics card, the ATI mobility Radeon HD 57030, since it is a new card and despite the amount people in these forums who have acquired a laptop with the card, there is still a lack of benchmark reviews. So far the only review on the card that I have found is http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=457517 and its focus is on overclocking.

    The system:
    CPU: Intel i5 430M (2.26GHz w/turbo up to 2.53GHz)
    4GB Ram
    GPU: is an ATI Radeon Mobility HD 5730 w/1 GB DDR3 Ram
    Note: the drivers for the GPU are the Catalist 10.3a (apparently not the official ones, but the pre-release).

    The benchmarks:
    These are a mixture of synthetic and in-built benchmark tools from games. I decided to include the synthetic bench for reference, but it should be emphasized that benchmarks from games are the real deal. Note: I decided to run only benchmark applications since they provide a consistent quantitative framework of testing, rather than playing 2 minutes any game and give my impressions.

    The methodology:
    Each benchmark has been taken 3 times and its average is presented. The windows environment is Windows 7 64-bits with the AVG antivirus active (but not scanning) with the Firefox explorer open. With no further introduction let´s see the results:

    3D mark ´06
    Resolution: 1280x768
    Result: 7807

    3D mark Vantage
    Resolution: 1366x768
    CPU: 6802
    GPU: 4179


    Crysis (w/benchmark utility, DX10, 64 bits)
    Resolution: 1280x720
    All high settings, no AA: 27.84
    All medium settings, 2x AA: 44.20

    Crysis (w/benchmark utility, DX9, 64 bits)
    Resolution: 1280x720
    All high settings, no AA: 29.11

    World in Conflict (Very high settings option, 4x AA/AF)
    Resolution: 1366x768
    Min/Avg/Max: 9/18/32

    Resident Evil 5 (all high settings, 2x AA)
    Resolution: 1360x768
    DX10: 46.1
    DX9c: 45.9


    Stalker: Call of Prypiat (Day/Night/Rain/Sun shaft)
    Resolution: 1366x768
    Medium settings, 2x AA w/DX 10 AA, DX 10: 27.2/24.9/27.1/17.9
    High settings, no AA, DX10: 36.6/37.2/41.0/20.2
    High settings, no AA, DX11: 37.7/37.8/42.0/20.7


    Comments: For both Resident evil and Stalker I don´t understand why the change from one version of direct X to another shows, surprisingly, a small increase in fps.

    In conclusion: for a “low” resolution (1366x768) laptop the mobility HD 5730 performs very good being able to play heavy duty games at their high settings with moderate AA (except crysis, as we know...).

    If you would like to make any comment, contribution, or ask for some other benchmark please do so and I´ll gladly will do it. Hopefully this report can serve as a reference for the new cards and ease many questions that have been presented in the forums.

    For a comparison here is the review from Anandtech with the same model laptop but with a different graphics card: the Nvidia GT325m with Optimus technology. Here is the link: http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=3765&p=1
     
  2. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Can you connect your machine to an external monitor and run the 3DMark tests at the 1280x1024 resolution that's standard? That would give your numbers some weight... as it is, the scores you're getting are not comparable to most other 3DMark scores you find elsewhere, as they're skewed high due to the lower resolution.
     
  3. lozanogo

    lozanogo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I understand your concern. At the moment I have no monitor at hand where I can make the test, but I will look for one with a friend.
     
  4. Adamal

    Adamal Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    116
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I believe it's somewhere around ~7100 for '06. If I get a chance tonight I'll run both on my external.
     
  5. Adamal

    Adamal Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    116
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    N61JQ-A1

    3DMark '06
    1280x1024 All Default
    3DMarks: 7201
    SM 2.0: 2615
    SM 3.0: 3106
    CPU: 3000


    3D Mark Vantage
    1280x1024 All Default
    3DMarks: P3845
    CPU: 10012
    Graphics: 3190
     
  6. tianxia

    tianxia kitty!!!

    Reputations:
    1,212
    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    can you run crysis in dx9 mode too?
     
  7. lozanogo

    lozanogo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I´ll try it tonight.
     
  8. tianxia

    tianxia kitty!!!

    Reputations:
    1,212
    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    thank you :D !
     
  9. lozanogo

    lozanogo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Done, I´ve updated it on the first post. In comparison with the all high settings, DX9 give 29.11fps. A small gain I´d say.
     
  10. tianxia

    tianxia kitty!!!

    Reputations:
    1,212
    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    the magic 30fps!
    it's nice to see ati pushing performance per watt rather than raw power.
    i'd rep you again if i could :p
     
  11. lozanogo

    lozanogo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Yeah, but remember there are many options, I am sure if shadows are lowered you can get and average fps above 30 easily. In fact 32.35fps :D
     
  12. cashman022

    cashman022 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    hi guys i need some help with my ASUS n61Jq well i recently bought this laptop and i really like it just got 2 questions on my mind if someone can help me with that would be great thanks ...

    1 atm screen resolution is i think 1366x768 is there any way i can go up in the resolution like 1920x1280 ...... is it possible or not .....
    2. i played cod 6 it totally works smooth on this laptop but when i m trying to pla gta IV the new episodes it just lags like in every 2 seconds why is that? does any one hv any idea how i can fix it ..... pls let me know my email id is [email protected]
     
  13. lozanogo

    lozanogo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    1. No, screen resolutions are fixed.
    2. GTA IV is well known to be CPU-bound. Your best chance is to reduce settings affecting the CPU (density of cars option, if it exists, etc.). If it works let me know, I've been wondering if to buy the game or not.
     
  14. melthd

    melthd Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    95
    Messages:
    494
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    wha! your Vantage GPU scores scared me much..until i saw the resolution. The 5730 is quite a bit better than the 4670 tho. How much does 500 marks translate into FPS gain?
     
  15. lozanogo

    lozanogo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    In 3D Mark 06 it was the percentage difference the change in FPS. The best way is to compare it to the game benchmarks I've provided, most of them come from demos or benchmark utilities.
     
  16. mrbee33

    mrbee33 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    98
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    seems like a ~500-600 point increase in 3dmark06 over the 4670...for all those sxps 16 people who believe this upgrade might be coming
     
  17. vlank

    vlank Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I bet with a nice win-7 optimizing, video driver change to a modified one and OC you can get the hell out of this card.

    I own an SXPS 1640 with an ati 3670 and with those tweaks/changes (oc up to 82% with only 5°+ with no added ventilation) i can put crysis at very high settings (tweaked cfg) DX9 and get around 24 FPS on 1280x900 (48+ on 800x600) (C2D p7350 - 2ghz, 3gb ram, 7200 rpm dd)

    So i could say that card would have a beast performance waiting to be unleashed...