would it be a serious mistake to buy a laptop with this GPU.
Will INTEL ever get it`s act together and fix the drivers.
Every laptop out basic to mid range their seems to have the chip.
what made manufactures build systems round this chip PRICE
regards
John.
-
Tinderbox (UK) BAKED BEAN KING
-
thnksfrthmmrs Notebook Evangelist
I wouldn't necessarily call it a mistake. Intel used to have horrible integrated graphics, but the X3100 is a big improvement over the past ones. Such an improvement that companies like ATI and AMD which I think now are merged should be worried about its integrated graphics lines.
Also the X3100 is perfect for anyone who does not game and who checks emails, browse the web listen to music, watch DVDs... and it also extends your battery life and keeps your laptop nice and cool and it's cheaper! -
Tinderbox (UK) BAKED BEAN KING
But why do some older games run much better on the older 950 GPU rather than the new X3100.
regards
John. -
Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator
There's nothing wrong with the X3100 when you consider its purpose; it does exactly what it was intended to do. It was designed for people who do not plan to do 3D applications.
-
X3000/X3100 on Vista will get par with XP eventually(maybe even better), but you are not gonna see IGPs performing even to the level of low end cards. You play the latest games and want them to play at high settings with minimal lag, you buy discrete graphics. -
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=2638594&postcount=239
-
on the down low basically intel has no hope of playing games, so dont get laptops with x3100, go for nvidia or ATI, x3100 wasnt meant for gaming
Any Hope For Intel X3100
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Tinderbox (UK), Nov 30, 2007.