You know steam may dominate the online sales but their prices have always seemed fair to me, it's not like they mark up the prices any higher than retail. I have a few amazon dl games and it's nice to have them but steam makes it so much simplistic to go through my games. Origin however is just a pita to use and really needs a design overhaul, and requiring origin just to play a $60 game is ridiculous
-
-
Mechanized Menace Lost in the MYST
Uploaded with ImageShack.us -
^ OMG I never even knew you could display your Steam games like that! Thanks for showing that lol now my steam game library looks 10x better.
-
-
masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook
BF3 is problematic. I don't think there is going to be any way to make it work neatly with steam.
I'm the type of person that doesn't have a billion icons on my desktop or all over my start menu bar.
The only reason that firefox and steam icons are visible below is that those applications are running. Normally it's blank. This is not the type of person who wants 5 different game launching applications.
On a separate note. I see that I have quite a few games on my steam list. It's growing... I wonder how much I spent, exactly? -
Mechanized Menace Lost in the MYST
-
masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook
he was saying steam prices are mostly very fair, and that origin is a PITA.
I've used origin and I personally haven't had any issues, but I've heard other people have been having issues.
Steam prices are slightly inflated in general, during sales they often have very good prices. -
The pita issue I have with Origin is the fact that it's a laggy system for me, even after a reinstall it'll still freeze up and I'll have to end the process. I actually got Dragon Age through Origin and it's a useable system but still has some bugs that need worked out in order to get me to use any more than I have to
-
Mechanized Menace Lost in the MYST
That is something I can agree with. I apologize for calling you a fanboy, but it seems everyone is bashing an unfinished product, which might have it's issues, but the issue of it not being steam is kinda pointless. Competition is good for us in the end. -
No, true competition would be offering BF3 on steam (and anywhere else for that matter), but then offering it on origin for a cheaper price, or have it include a dlc free or something. The major reason people like steam is because everything is in one place, they often have excellent sales, all your games stay updated automatically, friends list, VAC integration... and it even acts as its own type of DRM in most cases. Origin doesn't offer anything new. There is plenty of incentive for pc gamers of all types to use steam. The incentive to use origin is... BF3. -
SW:TOR will be an Origin exclusive for DD so there's another incentive. ME3 might not be available on Steam either so that could be another. Oh, and I don't see any Valve games being sold on other DDs (e.g. GG, D2D, GMG). -
masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook
another interesting note is that EA is fine with putting their game up on steam just like you said, and still letting origin do the patching, etc. Valve won't allow it. It would break the usability and expectations of steam.
-
Not really, I saw a couple of games offered in Steam that uses their own updater and patch system.
-
If it ends up releasing on steam on the condition that you use origin to update it then that's just as bad, if not worse.
While I haven't used origin myself and I can accept the fact that it works reasonably well given it's a new system, they shouldn't release a game on it untill it's pretty much bug free. Releasing a buggy game (BF3 will have bugs when it releases, probably some major ones) on a buggy system just doesn't seem right.
Also, while I enchourage competition in markets I don't see this as competition, if I had the option of buying it on steam or origin then I'd actually be more enclined, but the fact that they aren't giving us the choice kinda ticks me off. Competition is good in general, but if it means that you have all your games over dozens of different platforms then that's a real turn off.
I agree with what has already been posted in that we should have a seperate company for game distribution. They take something like 5% of all profits to fund themselves and it becomes a standard for all games to run on (5% is plenty to make money from, though it isn't enough to significantly impact sales). It would also be good if valve agreed to make it interface with steam so that you could still have all your old games. -
masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook
-
-
masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook
it's probably just about money in the end
Anyone not buying Battlefield 3 because of Open Beta?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by tetutato, Oct 20, 2011.