For everyone, including me who wants to know about the x2300's performance here are some links:
http://www.ecoustics.com/lm/Asus-A8JR
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/buyer/reviews/111023/asus-a8jr4p011c.html#
X2300 3d marks:
3DMark03: 3325 Points
3DMark05: 1571 Points
Comparable 7300 Go 3d marks:
3DMark03: 3700 points
3DMark05: 1600 points
The X2300 is NOT Dx10 compliant
-
Yeah, it's just a revised X1300, you could go the other way and see the 3DMark table for this info.
-
The X2300 was just a stupid marketing gimmick by ATI.
-
ltcommander_data Notebook Deity
I believe ATI's justification was that the "1xxx" series implies design for XP and they felt people would be more comfortable associating "2xxx" with Vista. It's similar to how nVidia has the GeForce 7100 series which is actually a GeForce 6200, but renamed to be more friendly to the Vista Aero Glass upgrade market. ATI also has a discrete X1050 solution that is actually a X300 but likewise renamed to be Vista friendly. It is all a marketing gimmick.
Ati Radeon Mobillity X2300 performance
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by zkureeman, May 13, 2007.