The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Can't integrated cards be made to...

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by aan310, Nov 30, 2008.

  1. aan310

    aan310 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    738
    Messages:
    3,811
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Ok, so why can't they make integrated cards feed off of quad cores?
    Granted that quads are not cheap enough to be in every computer, and ram is not either to ge t 6ish GB...

    but in the future, why can't the CPU and ram act as a graphics card? rake one or 2 cores of the processor, and 2 of the 6gb of ram... and there you go...

    can any one explain why they couldn't make something like this?
     
  2. Shaythong

    Shaythong Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    397
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I've read an article that had discussed about this topic before. I think it's called "The Impending CPU/GPU Fusion". Should search that up, it's an interesting topic. They talk about incorporating graphics processors on the CPU die.
     
  3. Lost Intelligence

    Lost Intelligence Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The article that I read regarding this very topic (no links, so take it for what it's worth) was stating that this will start to gain attention when CPU's are around the 8-core point.

    There are numerous articles on this as well, just buy using Google. It looks as if possibly AMD will be leading this movement (with them owning ATI)...
     
  4. aan310

    aan310 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    738
    Messages:
    3,811
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    106
    ok, ill look around...

    yea... AMD needs to do something.. they are kinda screwed :p


    but yea... i was thinking about this last night, and it sounded liek a good idea to me :p
     
  5. Lifeburner

    Lifeburner Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Dunno..... sounds pretty futuristic to me.

    I mean, we know that the technology incorporated in a GPU is different from the ones in a CPU, right? So, while blending these two together might be possible, I don't think anything like that would happen in the next five years.
     
  6. Lithus

    Lithus NBR Janitor

    Reputations:
    5,504
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Because the bus between the CPU and RAM is pathetic as far as bandwidth and speed required for 3D graphics.
     
  7. nic.

    nic. Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    97
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Because its what business about.
     
  8. Lifeburner

    Lifeburner Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hmm.... now I wonder if they could make a multi-core GPU.....
     
  9. Shaythong

    Shaythong Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    397
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    How about SLI in the new combined chipset? Now that would be massive.
     
  10. Necromas

    Necromas Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    198
    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Eventually as memory and designs become more efficient, and limits are overcome/bypassed, and we might have things like biomass processors that could actually make such efficiency possible, the GPU, CPU, and even the RAM will no longer have a reason to be separate components, at least as far as memory is concerned.
     
  11. ryo1000

    ryo1000 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    94
    Messages:
    723
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    if a dual core CPU let you run multiple programs at a same time, a dual core GPU would do the same thing, but what's the point of playing multiple games at the same time?
     
  12. Bungalo Bill

    Bungalo Bill Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    97
    Messages:
    806
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    RAM will likely die off when SSD's become the norm.
     
  13. ratchetnclank

    ratchetnclank Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,084
    Messages:
    1,506
    Likes Received:
    900
    Trophy Points:
    131
    No. It will offer increased performance when running a single game.

    Just like dual core cpu's offer increased performance on a single app as well.
     
  14. IntelUser

    IntelUser Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    364
    Messages:
    1,642
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Are you aware how much faster RAM is compared to SSD??

    Here's a comparison.

    DDR3-1333 can reach 8-9GB measured bandwidth with a good controller. Write reaches 60-70% of read speeds.

    SSD achieves 250MB read and 170MB write(currently the fastest 2.5 inch drive, X25-E)

    SSDs have typically 50-100 microseconds of latency. RAM latency measures in 50-100 nanoseconds.

    30-50x higher bandwidth and 1000x lower latency is what RAM offers. SSDs will never get there.