The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Crysis Warhead + 8600m GT?? Check here!

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by amoney3, Mar 15, 2009.

  1. amoney3

    amoney3 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Hey, guys. Cuban just released his v3.0 config, but the IQ with settings for those with an 8600m GT (which is considered low-end in the installation of Cuban's config), especially the DDR2 version, isn't as visually compelling as I think we'd like it to be. So, I took it upon myself to tweak out his config with customizations and additions of my own, and, well, I impressed myself. I ask that you guys check it out. Some screens are below. The game is extremely playable. You pull an avg for about 20-25fps on 1280x800 a DDR2(OCd), which is what I have.

    Crysis Warhead+8600m GT config

    Same screens + a few more
     

    Attached Files:

  2. amoney3

    amoney3 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Please post your thoughts if you tried the config. And for those who don't know how to use this, you just have to drop it into the Crysis WARHEAD folder.
     
  3. anothergeek

    anothergeek Equivocally Nerdy

    Reputations:
    668
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Sorry, but I didn't like it. Any build based on high shaders is just too slow for me to actually enjoy playing (commonly under 25 is too slow), or cuts corners like object quality or motion blur, which ruins the experience. I took ultima rage's level 4, axed the shaders and shadows to mainstream, and it runs smooth (25-35+ FPS throughout) but doesn't skimp out on the beautiful explosions, phsyics, and nauseating motion blur. Sure it doesn't look like RL, but mainstream shaders/shadows still look decent, and it's actually playable...

    I can post that if anyone wants it.
     
  4. amoney3

    amoney3 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    sure. post yours up. ill be glad to give it a go.
    the 20-25fps that I avg are fine for me since I'm a console gamer. I only recently started pc gaming (about a yr). Whenever I play, I have to turn the mouse sensitive down from the default in almost every game because its too quick.
     
  5. anothergeek

    anothergeek Equivocally Nerdy

    Reputations:
    668
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  6. amoney3

    amoney3 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    thnks. ill let you know how it goes(im in my CCNA class atm).
     
  7. Luke1708

    Luke1708 Notebook Virtuoso NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    352
    Messages:
    3,799
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Your talking 20-25fps on what graphics settings?
     
  8. amoney3

    amoney3 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Everything is all customized. The settings resemble enthusiast's textures, motion blur, water, and lighting effects. The shaders are semblant of the gamer settings.
     
  9. King of Interns

    King of Interns Simply a laptop enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1,329
    Messages:
    5,418
    Likes Received:
    1,096
    Trophy Points:
    331
    From my experience without the modification shaders and motion blur cut the performance most. With both set at mainstream and the rest at enthusiast I can get up to 1400x1050 perfectly playable (DX9 of course). Although having ample CPU power may help here.
     
  10. amoney3

    amoney3 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    it definitely does! shadows and object quality are extremely taxing on performance. So for you to pump them out at max on that rez must be in part due to your CPU.
     
  11. anothergeek

    anothergeek Equivocally Nerdy

    Reputations:
    668
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I made my own version of cuban's level 3... try this out, it gets a little lower performance than my mainstream shader build, has no motion blur or depth of field, and has lessened lod and particles. But the shaders are nicer kinda like a 2.5, there's hdr and edge aa.

    http://rapidshare.com/files/210946528/autoexec.cfg.html

    Let me know what you think...the textures may be a bit too high for 256mb cards, if so just change them in game.
     
  12. nizzy1115

    nizzy1115 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,557
    Messages:
    6,682
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I think you can really see the difference between that and what it really looks like on enthusiast.


    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]



    <object width='400' height='300'>


    <embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3757806&server=vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=&fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width='400' height='300'></object>
    Crysis Warhead 1920x1200 from nizzy1115 on Vimeo.

    While i think its neat that you can make it run on that hardware, i think there is a big difference between how it looks though. (This is everything maxed except for 0xAA - 20-30 fps average). The vid is compressed even though i uploaded the raw 1/2 gb file.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2015
  13. anothergeek

    anothergeek Equivocally Nerdy

    Reputations:
    668
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I couldn't change the lod in-game, but yeah, you can see the difference.... as well as the huge fps drop! Honestly I think the stock enthusiast is too dark, I would use a cutomized very high config and probably get more fps from it.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. nizzy1115

    nizzy1115 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,557
    Messages:
    6,682
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Wow, 50% fps drop, thats crazy!
     
  15. zijin_cheng

    zijin_cheng Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    16
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    well i have a 9600m gt and i did the tweaking myself and i'm getting 25-27fps with enthusiast. for those people who think that's way too low, then thank the crysis developers for some intelligence. they implemented motion blur that really smoothes out gameplay so it feels like you have like a normal 60fps game.