Well finally I got Warhead to run and look great in 1920x1200 by a custom config. What do you think?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
It looks nice. But I was wondering if you could show us a shot with some anti-aliasing enabled? Sure it might be slow but would be pretty cool to see the edges a little bit smoother.
-
Looks good, but a little too bright for my tastes.
-
That is fantastic. The screenies are a little too big in my opinion though, I like them compressed and wholesome rather than large and detailed
edit: nevermind... it's probably because my toshiba maxes out at 1200*800 -
-
-
Thumbnails would be nice.
-
Yeah sorry guys about the size. Personally I don´t need any AA at 1920x1200. Sure I could put on Edge AA. Though I think it looks crisper without EdgeAA.
-
The screenshots don't look very good IMHO, but like you said, it looks better on screen.
-
Well yeah edges are crisper if AA is off...AA is off! Just the screenshots make the objects look ripped up a bit.
-
Hot stuff.
-
True, though nothing you note when you are playing and moving around. More visible on screenshots like this, 1920x1200 is an insane resolution overall. So jaggies are less visible than running at a lower resolution.
-
Nice shots though. What config did you use?
How's the game during the ice levels? -
Runs great even during the ice levels. It´s a config I first made for Crysis, then I have fine tuned it even more to get better quality out of while still maintaining good FPS.
Crysis Warhead screens on XPS M1730, 8800m GTX SLI. No 56k!
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Magnus72, Sep 22, 2008.