Let's say you get a laptop with 4GB RAM and a powerful GPU such as an 8800GTX...
Would there be a noticeable difference when you have either a 2.4Ghz Intel CPU or a 2.8Ghz Intel Extreme CPU?
EDIT: For games lol. E.g. Crysis (which seems to be a popular benchmark nowadays)
-
Not really, unless your doing ALOT of CPU heavy tasks and/or have the 2.8 OC'd.
-
It depends on what you're doing. A lot of cases RAM will make the system feel more responsive but for intensive processing applications then extra CPU speed will increase performance of whatever task you're running.
-
I also didnt factor cache, FSB speed, brand and general architecture. My statement above assumes all four are the same.
-
Yeah, same for the other factors.
And I meant for gaming sorry, my bad. -
Even for gaming there will be no noticeable difference.
-
mobius1aic Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer
Your GPU will bottleneck before anything else.
-
Wow... It seems like paying £hundreds more for extra Mhz seems very pointless! I think I will get a laptop with an Intel Dual Core 2.4Ghz or something rather than the "extreme" 2.8Ghz.
-
Getting the extreme CPU is for people who do heavy encoding, or people who have to have the best.
-
we proved in clovo forum that cpu has a big impact in crysis(we compared q9550 to 9650)
-
-
-
Since this is a gaming forum, for RTS games, CPU is important since it manages hundreds if not thousands (Supreme Commander) of units simultaneously. Flight Sims are also more CPU than GPU hogs.
But for most cases, FPS and other genre games are much more GPU dependent. -
Supreme commander is more CPU intensive because of the physics
Does the extra mhz do much on a CPU?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Darbyjack, Sep 4, 2008.