EA backs down on FORUM BAN = GAME BAN policy:
Link: http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?messageID=4410153�
So, they claim it was a mistake. I am not so sure about that, but ultimately it does not matter, what matters is that the the policy is gone. I guess they do deserve a bit of kudos for turning it around so quickly after the deluge of negative feedback they received.
Nevertheless, EA still remains on my no-buy list due to its draconian DRM (DDRM) that requires online activation and has limited installs. DDRM of this nature does not fight piracy, it outright encourages it. I have even created an icon to represent it, that I may use in some fora as my avatar or signature. Feel free to use it too: http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/176/rlonlineactivationpiracga0.png
I would like to say that I do not support piracy in any way - the icon merely describes what online activation and limited installs do, so that hopefully higher-ups realize it - the icon does not seek to encourage it.
-
Here is the original policy directly from the EA's community manager:
Link: http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?threadID=449687&tstart=0&start=0 -
That community manager is just nasty..
I mean, "However, its a lot harder to get a new serial key =)" what the hell is with that smiley!!!@ -
Well, the initial policy was definitely unacceptable. That said, I am happy they backed down.
-
Community manager probably had a friendly "chat" with the company's legal arm and realised he'd made a serious screw-up. At least it shows EA aren't completely useless at human resource management.
-
I suspect the story was a bit different. The forum ban = game ban policy was probably real EA policy, but got pulled after the internet outcry. In order to save face, EA decided to let the Community Manager take the flak. At least that seems to be the most plausible possibility, given that a similar policy was also advanced on the Spore forums by a moderator a few weeks ago. It would be a strange coincidence if both of these people made the same 'mistake'.
-
It's EA so the conspiracy theory holds water for me, this publisher is one of the few deserving of its scum reputation.
-
Yep, I can't actually think of a worse publisher than the EA at the moment. It's not just the forum policy, but also the DRM and the future exclusively-online dollars/consumer business model.
-
Too little, too late EA.
-
Just read the gamespot news article on EA, it seems the stock analysts are getting fed up with propping up its share price with positive reviews. This forum fiasco will surely be a further boost to their credibility as game publishers.
-
I never was a fan of EA anyway ... they tend to destroy any games they get ahold of.
And this is just funny.
EA is no good. -
It's a pity that EA has such a good upcoming game lineup (Red Alert 3, Dragon Age...) - it would be much easier to boycott it if it had worse games. Ultimately, though, I am not going to buy games with draconian DRM (DDRM), regardless of how good they are. I did not buy Mass Effect, despite the games attractions, so no doubt I will hold out on the other DDRM-infested games too.
EA backs down on forum ban = game ban policy
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Destrel, Oct 31, 2008.