The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    FEAR Combat on HP ze2000 (ATI Radeon Xpress 200M)

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by ronkotus, Jun 5, 2007.

  1. ronkotus

    ronkotus Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    175
    Messages:
    619
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    My friend got a HP ze2000 laptop. Specs:
    AMD Sempron 2800+ (~1.6 GHz, 256KB L2 cache)
    1024MB DDR 333Mhz Memory
    40GB 4200rpm HDD
    ATI Radeon Xpress 200M graphics with 128MB dedicated video memory

    He doesn't game a lot, but I managed to convince him of the bliss of multiplayer FPS, particularly FEAR Combat. :) Now, my friend won't accept (yet :rolleyes: ) to download the large game package (1,8GB), if he's not 100% sure the game can run playable on his system. He got only 4GB of free HDD space left, so he propably have to remove something before installing the game. What I know from threads found here in NBR is that 1GB of memory and Xpress 200M with dedicated 128MB should handle the game pretty well atleast at 640x480 resolution with minimum settings. And IMHO the minimum settings are best for multiplayer FEAR anyway, so no worries there.

    But how can the Sempron 1.6GHz cope with the game that lists Pentium 4 1.7GHz as a minimum CPU requirement? And can he expect atleast a minimum of 25 fps in heavy firefights on his system with those settings? I would appreciate the minimum fps ratings from anyone with similar system specs with these settings: 640x480, music Off, every graphics/computer settings set at minimum except of course these two: DX8 Shaders - Off and Pixel Doubling - Off. (if those are set On, the game looks like Doom 1 :D )
     
  2. _radditz_

    _radditz_ Fallen to the Sith...

    Reputations:
    120
    Messages:
    1,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Its defiantly playable ive seen screenshots of FEAR on the x200m and if you search around the forum im sure you can find them. Im not sure what settings they were taken at.

    But honestly is it really fun playing at low res and uber low detail? Whay not buy an older game and turn the graphics up? e.g. Dues Ex? Serious Sam?
     
  3. Vaath

    Vaath Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    77
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I was on of those who you speak of, I played on a similar setup on my old HP dv8125nr (look up specs at hp.com)

    Only difference from factory was I made it 2 gig of ram.

    On said system I ran 800x600 on mostly low but some medium (can't remember offhand as that was 8 months ago) and I got a very playable FEAR Combat Online.

    So the video should not stop you from enjoying low rez low detail gaming. Guessing it would be slower than mine as its 1.8ghz opposed to 1.6ghz and had more ram.

    But give it a shot, should be able to run 640x480 everything low fine is my guess.
     
  4. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    if you are trying to open him up to fps's, FEAR is too much of a system hog to convince him. it will be a miserable experience.

    check out half life and counter strike (original not source)

    I would recommend hl2 and cs:s, but for integrated graphics, the originals will be a better experience.
     
  5. ronkotus

    ronkotus Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    175
    Messages:
    619
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks for your replies.

    The guy has tried some older FPS games like Alien vs Predator, Unreal Tournament, but never online, only single player or in very small LAN. So he knows what fps games are. He doesn't buy games, because he rarely plays on his PC. I suggested him FEAR Combat, which he considered trying since it's completely free.

    I have seen Havok's FEAR Combat screenshots. They suggest 30-40 fps for games with max number of 8 players. Havok's 200m had only 64MB shared memory and there were no dedicated memory, so it's good to know it was actually worse than my friends' one. But those screenshots doesn't tell much about the real gameplay since there's not much action. Is it completely smooth or are there any stuttering that disrupt proper aiming? If the fps won't drop under 25 in any situation at settings I reported earlier, then I would think it's very playable.

    And yes it's great fun even at lowest settings, not sure about the lowest resolution though. But my cousin plays it always at 640x480 reso with his desktop, so it's propably not that bad at all. Even I play at lowest settings except at native 1440x900 reso. Actually, in FEAR Combat the gameplay is more important than eye candy which can actually hurt your competency (shadows, smoke, bodies etc.). The game is so intensive, you wan't as little other distractions as possible. Of course when I play the single player I turn everything at maximum, because there the atmosphere is more important.
     
  6. chesieofdarock

    chesieofdarock Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    314
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    if the game is free just download it and see for yourself
     
  7. ronkotus

    ronkotus Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    175
    Messages:
    619
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    That's what I'm trying to get him do. :)