Say for example i play test drive unlimited alot , and on my midrange ati x1400 i much prefer full anti-aliasing , 1280x800 resoloution and all setting turned to max with a 25 frames per secconds , compared to the 50 odd that i can get with low resoloution and all settins minimum.
Heck i will play a game at 10 fps , as long as it looks good and is at a high resoloution
This is my order of preferances genrally
1High resoloution
2Anti-aliasing 4x
3Anti-aliasing 2x
4High texture settings
5High shadows/reflections
I cannot play a gamne at a low crummy resoloution , I have to use 1280x800 minimum.
Whereas on my desktop with 2x "Sapphire X1950Pro 512MB DDR3 Dual DVI VIVO AGP Graphics Card" I run all games max settings and get brill FPS . but i much prefer my laptop , I just wish it had a better GPU.
Perhaps ill upgrade in the next few years as its a mmx one![]()
-
True im like that too, Im more for Details... I mean resolution vs settings is huge.. I mean some lappies fall to their knees on one resolution up, I hear some games fall 70% just by upping the resolution vs settings...
Final Crysis Requirements...Don't kill the messenger for the bad message
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by The Forerunner, Oct 9, 2007.