The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Flight Sim X on a MBP?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by eeperman, Feb 7, 2009.

  1. eeperman

    eeperman Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I am about to treat myself to a 2.3GHz Macbook Pro with a 9600MGT 512Mb graphics card. I will spend most of my time in OSX, but will be playing some games through Boot Camp. Has anyone had any experience with FSX on this machine or an equivalent spec?

    I'm not expecting all the bells and whistles, but would be interested to know what sort of performance I could expect.
     
  2. cdnalsi

    cdnalsi Food for the funky people

    Reputations:
    433
    Messages:
    1,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I played it on my previous Gen Macbook Pro, the one with the 8600M GT.

    It ran pretty good I must say. I didn't have all the extra add-ons like real environment and stuff like that, but it was totally playable, and then some.

    So I'm thinking the 9600M GT would be okay. Just get the latest Direct X and nVidia drivers!
     
  3. zeve

    zeve Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    64
    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I respectfully disagree. FSX is too much CPU intensive to really deliver on your machine.

    If you want a civilian flightsim, install FS9. You'll be able to use all the bells and whistles and still get a smooth fps count with it. And with the add-ons you will be able to install and use, the visual experience will be better than FSX is able to deliver in a machine like yours.
     
  4. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I concur with zeve...
     
  5. be77solo

    be77solo pc's and planes

    Reputations:
    1,460
    Messages:
    2,631
    Likes Received:
    306
    Trophy Points:
    101
    what cpu does the MBP have? FSX runs great on my Toshiba, both with the 2.5ghz in it now, and with the prior 2.0ghz cpu before I upgraded. It's even totally playable on my tablet with the integrated 3200hd and a 2.4ghz AMD cpu... I'd think that it would run quite well with the 9600 that's in the MBP.
     
  6. Ghold

    Ghold Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    78
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    MBP's come with C2D
     
  7. be77solo

    be77solo pc's and planes

    Reputations:
    1,460
    Messages:
    2,631
    Likes Received:
    306
    Trophy Points:
    101
    I'd say you'll be fine then with it hardware wise... now I have no idea if there's a performance penalty running PC software on a MBP, but a C2D and a 9600GT will run FSX just fine. My old 1.66 ghz toshiba with the 8700GT ran FSX quite well, and your new machine is quite a bit faster than that, so you should be fine... not sure what native resolution is, but I was running it on mine at 1440x900 with most things set to high.

    Good luck!
     
  8. Apollo13

    Apollo13 100% 16:10 Screens

    Reputations:
    1,432
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Unless there's a significant penalty to running Windows on Apple hardware, I think you'll be just fine. I have a 2.2 GHz Core 2 and the 8600M GT, and the FSX demo ran pretty well on my computer. Not maximum settings, but definitely good ones. You'll be able to get a lot better graphics at the same performance as you would with FS9 - I have the full version of that and while it runs great on my machine the graphics just pale in comparison with FSX. Even at maximum, FS9 doesn't look nearly as real-world as FSX with lower settings.