The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    GDDR3 and GGDR5 but where is GDDR4?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Satyrion, Jun 9, 2010.

  1. Satyrion

    Satyrion Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    123
    Messages:
    1,404
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Today we always see either 3 or 5 buy why never 4? where did it go?
     
  2. Amnesiac

    Amnesiac 404

    Reputations:
    1,312
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    106
    There was actually GDDR4 for quite some time, it kind of hung around for a while, but died out with the introduction of the Radeon HD 4000 series, as the high end cards in this range came with GDDR5. I don't think any NVIDIA cards ever had GDDR4, but some Radeon and MR cards did. I think the old 2900XT came with it - if it wasn't the 2900, then it was probably something a little more midrange.

    There is also a variation of the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 (incidentally the card that happens to be in my notebook) that came with GDDR4, but I don't think any manufacturers ever used it. If they did, it was fairly obscure.

    I assume some other cards in the 2000 and 3000 series also came with GDDR4.
     
  3. kosti

    kosti Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,162
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    101
  4. yotano211

    yotano211 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    63
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    RIP in GDDR4
     
  5. mobius1aic

    mobius1aic Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    240
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Sapphire did release one model of the 4670 with GDDR4. GDDR3 speeds could get close to GDDR4 at times (that particular card had memory at 1100 MHz), and GDDR5 of course offered up twice the bandwidth, so GDDR4 was kind of unneeded.
     
  6. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,906
    Trophy Points:
    931
    GDDR4 was very, VERY power hungry and was not much faster than GDDR3. Therefore was a bit of a failure. Certainly not for laptops.
     
  7. kosti

    kosti Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,162
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    101
    GDDR4: The Vista of Graphics Memory
     
  8. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    You mean the Windows Millennium.
     
  9. Amnesiac

    Amnesiac 404

    Reputations:
    1,312
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    106
  10. mobius1aic

    mobius1aic Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    240
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I like Vista.............I'm almost compelled to buy a copy of Vista 64 so I can have my Windows Media Player mini-toolbar back.
     
  11. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Sometimes I find Vista to be better than 7, and both definitely a step up from XP.
     
  12. Amnesiac

    Amnesiac 404

    Reputations:
    1,312
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    106
    How the heck did we manage this, lol? :confused:
     
  13. sean473

    sean473 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i agree with u on being better than XP but IMO windows 7 is better and more stable.
     
  14. CrAzYsIm

    CrAzYsIm Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    in my personal experience, Windows Vista was faster then Windows 7. I get alot of hiccups and freezes with Windows 7 that I never had with vista. Makes me want to go back. And I liked the way UAC was in Vista
     
  15. silentnite2608

    silentnite2608 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
  16. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Exactly what I've experienced on my personal notebook (Acer in sig), though my gf's Win 7 notebook is stable as ever. It's probably just a certain combination of factors that aren't interplaying very well.
     
  17. Fat Dragon

    Fat Dragon Just this guy, you know?

    Reputations:
    1,736
    Messages:
    2,110
    Likes Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Hmm...

    I'm happy to acknowledge that Vista isn't nearly as bad as it's historically been made out to be, thanks to its rushed release and poor early driver support, but from the moment I switched from Vista to Win 7 RC1, it was Instant Joy Upgrade +10 for my lappy, and the real thing is even better.

    And to keep things slightly on-topic - I'd always wondered about GDDR4 as well, so I'm glad that's been answered. :D