Which one is more new and will perform better?
My friend has a GMA900 and has gotten Combat Arms (TnL required) to play.
Whilst on my dads Eeepc 1000HD(1024x600 reso) with a GMA950 will not run it.
It will say something liike:
"needs directX 9.0 or higher and a graphic card that supports TnL"
AFAIK, both of those chips don't support TnL.....
Why does it work on a GMA900 and not GMA950? Is it due to resolution problems; if so, the error doesn't mention anything like that.
PS:
I forgot to mention that my friend has had it both running on XP and Vista.
Whilst my dad's eeepc is XP.
-
Good lord.
Anyways, the GMA950 is ?half a generation newer than the GMA900.
Try upgrading the drivers.
Also, is your friends GMA900 in a desktop?
edit: doesnt the 1000HD have a GMA900? -
Sorry, I forgot to mention that both of these chips are in laptops!
I will try and update the drivers as soon as I can... BUt I don't know where to get them
Thx for ur reply -
Check the Asus website, or go to the Intel website.
-
What's the difference between the 1st and 2nd drivers in the Intel website?
They look exactly the same, I've checked the read me and release notes... yet one is slightly bigger... -
one is for developers, prolly get the other one.
GMA900 vs GMA950 (weakest IGPs lol)
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by jing713, Dec 13, 2008.