GPU-Z for nVidia's latest mobile GPUs?

Since there are so many different models, I have compiled the info on the specs of most of the lastest line of nVidia's mobile GPUs. I hope people find it useful since I have seen a lot of questions regarding specs!

I'm sure I don't have all the different models and variants. So far here is my list. I do not know a few of the specs indicated by a "?" in the boxes (TDP of 9800M GS, 9500M G, and 9200M GS) nor do I know all the models that have GDDR2/3 variants nor their difference in memory clock speed. If you have a GPU w/ different specs please post up the GPU-Z screenshot and I'll add the data to the table (or notice any mistakes).

edit: updated spreadsheet in pic attached, didn't want to mess up the HTML and added ATI info below as well.

Tier 1
Rank	Model	Codename	Core	Process	TDP	S.P.<sup>1</sup>	M.B.W.<sup>2</sup>	Core	Shader	Memory<sup>3</sup>	Amount	Type
1/2	FX 3700M/9800M GTX	NB9E-GTX	G92	65nm	75W	128/112	256-bit	550/500MHz	1250MHz	800MHz	1GB	GDDR3
3/4	9800M GT/8800M GTX <sup> 4</sup>	NB9E-GT2	G92	65nm	65W	96	256-bit	500MHz	1250MHz	800MHz	512MB	GDDR3
5	9800M GTS	NB9E-GT/1	G94/b	65/55nm	75W	64	256-bit	600MHz	1500MHz	800MHz	1GB	GDDR3
6	9800M GS	NB9E-GT	G94	65nm	?	64	256-bit	530MHz	1325MHz	800MHz	512MB	GDDR3
7/8	FX 3600M/8800 GTS	NB8E	G92	65nm	70/50W	64	256-bit	500MHz	1250MHz	800MHz	512MB	GDDR3
9/10	FX 2700M/9700M GTS	NB9E-GS	G94	65nm	65/60W	48	256-bit	530MHz	1325MHz	800MHz	512MB	GDDR3
Tier 2
11/12	FX 1700M/9700M GT	NB9E-GE	G96	65nm	50/45W	32	128-bit	625MHz	2500/1550MHz	800MHz	512MB	GDDR2/3
13	9650M GT	NB9P-GT	G96b	55nm	23W	32	128-bit	550MHz	1325MHz	800MHz	512MB/1GB	GDDR2/3
14/15	FX 770M/9600M GT	NB9P-GS	G96	65nm	35/23W	32	128-bit	500MHz	1250MHz	800MHz	256/512MB/1GB	GDDR2/3
16	9600M GS	NB9P-GE2	G96	65nm	20W	32	128-bit	430MHz	1075MHz	800MHz	512MB/1GB	GDDR2/3
17	9500M G	NB9P-GV	G96	65nm	?	16	128-bit	500MHz	1250MHz	800MHz	512MB/1GB	GDDR2/3
Tier 3
18	9400M G	MCP79MX	integrated	65nm	12W	16	128-bit	450MHz	1100MHz	-	-	-
19/20/21	FX 370M/NVS 160M/9300M GS	NB9M-GS	G98	65nm	20/12/13W	8	64-bit	580/580/550MHz	1450/1450/1400MHz	700MHz	256MB	GDDR2/3
22/23	NVS 150M/9200M GS	NB9M-GE	G98	65nm	10W/?	8	64-bit	530/550MHz	1300MHz	700MHz	256MB	GDDR2/3

¹ Stream Processors
² Memory Bus Width
³ GDDR2 seems to have 1/2 the speed of GDDR3 (the listed speed)

⁴ Supposedly there is a 55nm variant based on the G94b core (NB9E-GS1), but I have yet to see proof of this product existing. Same with a few other products such as 9700M GS, etc.
http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/Nvidia_55nm_Mobile_Graphics_Cards_Unveiled/5705.html

I would like to thank Andy for his help in fixing my HTML

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've added some data on my chart at home regarding ATI cards, but I have exams so I've been neglecting completing the online chart. Here is some basic info (specs wise, its measured differently than nVidia):

Tier 1: 256-bit

HD 4870 M98XT RV770 55nm 75W 800 256-bit 680 680 700 1GB GDDR5
HD 4850 M98 RV770 55nm 75W 800 256-bit 550 550 700 1GB GDDR3

Those are equivalent to the 9800M GTX or better.

HD 3870 M88 RV670 55nm 55W 320 256-bit 660 660 850 512MB GDDR3
HD 3850 M88 RV670 55nm 55W 320 256-bit 580 580 750 512MB GDDR3

Those are equivalent to the 9700M GTS or better.

Tier 2: 128-bit

HD 4670 M96XT RV730 55nm 30W 320 128-bit 675 675 800 512MB GDDR3
HD 4650 M96 RV730 55nm 25W 320 128-bit 550 550 600/800 512MB DDR2/3

Those are equivalent to 9700M GT or higher.

FireGL V5725 M86 RV620 55nm 30W 120 128-bit 680 680 800 256MB GDDR3
HD 3670 M86XT RV620 55nm 30W 120 128-bit 680 680 800 256/512MB GDDR3
FireGL V5700 M86GL (HD 3650) RV620 55nm 30W 120 128-bit 600 600 700 256/512MB GDDR3
HD 3650 M86 RV620 55nm 30W 120 128-bit 600 600 500/700 256/512MB/1GB DDR2/3

Those are about the 9600M GS, better than the 9500M G and 8600M GT/9500M GS and worse than the 9600M GT.

Tier 3: 64-bit

HD 4570 55nm 15W 80 64-bit 680 680 800 256MB GDDR3
HD 4530 55nm 12W 80 64-bit 500 500 700 256MB GDDR3
HD 4330 55nm 7W 80 64-bit 450 450 256MB DDR2/3

Those are equivalent to 9400M G or better.

HD 3470 M82XT RV620 55nm 12W 40 64-bit 680 680 500/800 128/256/512MB DDR2/3
HD 3450 M82 RV620 55nm 12W 40 64-bit 550 550 500/700 128/256/512MB DDR2/3
HD 3430 M82SE RV620 55nm 12W 40 64-bit 500 500 500/700 128/256/512MB DDR2/3
HD 3200 integrated RS780M 55nm 40 500 500 - - -

Those are about the 9300M GS, better than the 9100M GS and 9200M GS and worse than the 9400M G. (Approximately...)

 

Nice! I always thought something like this would be handy, but never found one nor went around to compiling it. I like that you include power use and the equivalent Quadro cards - those are always the things I find myself looking for and not being able to find.

 

Here's the stat for te 9500M GS.

 

I have the same laptop as you. I chose not to include rebranded 8 series GPUs since they're still on the older 80nm process and really have nothing new compared to the 8600M GT, except a few refinements. If people want, I can add the 8 series GPUs too but I felt that since the 9 series already has so many already, that I'd stick with the most recent series.

 

Won't the clocks be different for the DDR2 and GDDR3 versions....?

 

Hi sgogeta4,

Nice Work!

G!

 

I believe they would be but I don't have the specs for them, hence why I'm asking for people to let me know

 

Oh well, I have only 2 screenies..

 

It would be nice to see the 8 series listed as well. Especially for people who have the 8 series and are looking for a new laptop, it's helpful to see where your current GPU ranks relative to the new ones. It's good insight in determining your next purchase.

 

I'm in the process of adding ATI cards as well as nVidia's 10 series. I have some 8 series (the 65nm ones - 8800M GTX, 8800M GTS) but didn't bother listing 80nm ones due to their obsolete status.

edit: uploaded file I'm working on, please let me know if you have any info that I haven't added and if possible a source

edit2: put attachment in 1st post

 

Ok... I guess this charts useless to me since I use an 8600m GT and if I were to consider a new laptop I wouldn't be able to gauge the performance increase I would see. If I was considering a system with a 9200/9400 I'm obviously not going to game on it but if I was gaming I would be interested in 9600-9800 performance. Again, if I can't measure against current performance, not sure what the chart is good for. Good luck!

 

The 8 series has been out for a while, searching the forums yields a lot of results. I'll add the specs of the 8 series cards to the table.

Comparisons of 8600M GT DDR2/GDDR3 with 9600M GS DDR2/GDDR3, 9600M GT DDR2/GDDR3, HD 3650 DDR2/GDDR3 are plentiful. Memory size is pretty much irrelevant above 256MB.

http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4555
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4573

On average 9600M GT is 15-20% faster than 8600M GT of the same memory type. The 9600M GS is roughly on par with the 8600M GT. The HD 3650 is between the 9600M GS and GT. Hope that helps!

 

Just ordered an HP dv7t with the 9600M GT but now that I see this chart with the TDP numbers I wonder if I should have ordered the 9200M GS for better battery life ... graphics performance/gaming not important to me... Would both of these play Blu-Ray ok ?

 

Here is my 9100m g

 

The 9200 will handle Blu-ray perfectly, so if you have no desire fore gaming, downgrade your GPU asap.

 

First off, incredibly useful chart. Thanks for putting the time into it.

Do you have any plans to compile a similar chart for ATI GPU's? Additionally, it would be helpful if there were an additional column that listed the equivalent part(s) from ATI (likewise for nVidia equivalents on an ATI chart).

Thanks again!

 

I've added some data on my chart at home regarding ATI cards, but I have exams so I've been neglecting completing the online chart. Here is some basic info (specs wise, its measured differently than nVidia):

Tier 1: 256-bit

HD 4870 M98XT RV770 55nm 75W 800 256-bit 680 680 700 1GB GDDR5
HD 4850 M98 RV770 55nm 75W 800 256-bit 550 550 700 1GB GDDR3

Those are equivalent to the 9800M GTX or better.

HD 3870 M88 RV670 55nm 55W 320 256-bit 660 660 850 512MB GDDR3
HD 3850 M88 RV670 55nm 55W 320 256-bit 580 580 750 512MB GDDR3

Those are equivalent to the 9700M GTS or better.

Tier 2: 128-bit

HD 4670 M96XT RV730 55nm 30W 320 128-bit 675 675 800 512MB GDDR3
HD 4650 M96 RV730 55nm 25W 320 128-bit 550 550 600/800 512MB DDR2/3

Those are equivalent to 9700M GT or higher.

FireGL V5725 M86 RV620 55nm 30W 120 128-bit 680 680 800 256MB GDDR3
HD 3670 M86XT RV620 55nm 30W 120 128-bit 680 680 800 256/512MB GDDR3
FireGL V5700 M86GL (HD 3650) RV620 55nm 30W 120 128-bit 600 600 700 256/512MB GDDR3
HD 3650 M86 RV620 55nm 30W 120 128-bit 600 600 500/700 256/512MB/1GB DDR2/3

Those are about the 9600M GS, better than the 9500M G and 8600M GT/9500M GS and worse than the 9600M GT.

Tier 3: 64-bit

HD 4570 55nm 15W 80 64-bit 680 680 800 256MB GDDR3
HD 4530 55nm 12W 80 64-bit 500 500 700 256MB GDDR3
HD 4330 55nm 7W 80 64-bit 450 450 256MB DDR2/3

Those are equivalent to 9400M G or better.

HD 3470 M82XT RV620 55nm 12W 40 64-bit 680 680 500/800 128/256/512MB DDR2/3
HD 3450 M82 RV620 55nm 12W 40 64-bit 550 550 500/700 128/256/512MB DDR2/3
HD 3430 M82SE RV620 55nm 12W 40 64-bit 500 500 500/700 128/256/512MB DDR2/3
HD 3200 integrated RS780M 55nm 40 500 500 - - -

Those are about the 9300M GS, better than the 9100M GS and 9200M GS and worse than the 9400M G. (Approximately...)

edit: info added to 1st post

 

I have a stupid question;
from this list it seems like the 9300M GS consumes alot less power than the 9600M GT but I cant really see a negative difference except for Memory Bus Width and Stream Processors. Does that really make a big difference in gameplay? How much longer battery life do you think the 9300M GS will give?

 

The combination of 4x more shader processors and 2x the bandwidth is huge, but so is the decrease in battery life. It really depends on the game, I wouldn't be able to give you a definite answer without knowing that. Battery life, I'd estimate to be a good 45+ minutes, if not more for the 9300M GS.

 

It's hard to believe my 9600GT is 23W as it's the main heat generator in my machine

 

C:\Users\Paul\Desktop\GPU
9800M GTS on a Gateway p-7805u 17' lappy

 

To post an image, go to an image-hosting website like this and upload the picture. Then use the [IMG*](URL Here)[/IMG*] tags without the asterisks.

 

Gateway FX p-7805u 9800M GTS with 17" LCD 1440x900
Nevermind. I missed it the first 2 times I looked at the list. Now I see it. COOOOOL!!!!!!!

 

Try using the latest GPU-Z 0.3.3

 

Here you go.

 

Hei, this reminds me of an old thread of mine:

http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=355818

I haven't updated it but it was used to show Nvidia chipset naming and rebranding.

I should update some of the info there.

EDIT: You can use the info and pictures there freely.

 

I should update some of the info here too... I'm still waiting for someone to buy a notebook with a GT 120M so that I can fill in the clocks! Also, the GTX 170M (though it might have been replaced by the GTX 260M), I believe it was supposed to be in one of the Asus' models from CES. Also, looking for GTS 150M (core clock), GT 102M (memory clock), and all the clocks for HD 3410.

 

Looking for anyone with a GTS 150M, GT 220M, or GT 120M to take a GPU-Z screenshot. I have no clock speed info on any of these models... Thanks!

 

130m?

I hope this helps.

Great job with the thread by the way.

Thanks for you work.

Be well, JW

 

Thanks. I've kinda neglected it though. I think I'll try to revise it now that a lot of cards have been out and tested for a while.

 

maybe useful [/URL][/IMG]

 

Move over, rank 1



Until someone with a GTX 280M comes along that is.

Also, ignore the checkboxes at the bottom of the image. I've been messing with my drivers lately (to find something with the best performance), and with 195.62, all the boxes are checked.

EDIT: And the clocks I've set are NVIDIA's reference clocks, the 'default' clocks below are ASUS' underclocked speeds.

EDIT 2: Also, in 3DMark06 results, my GPU shows up as a GTX 170M online (although in the program it says GTX 260M), if that's any help at all (you've labelled the 9800M GS as the GTX 170M in your chart).

 

Sorry, but the 4570 is just a tiny bit better than the 3650. So is the 8600M GT.

 

Sony CW G210m