The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    GRaphic Card Equivalent

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by cumbaya19, Nov 29, 2008.

  1. cumbaya19

    cumbaya19 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    What cards are equivalent to the 512MB NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT.Which are worse which are better?

    When it says Pentium(R) 4 2.4GHZ
    does that mean its better than Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo Processor P8400 (2.26 GHz?
     
  2. nizzy1115

    nizzy1115 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,557
    Messages:
    6,682
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    no...any core 2 duo will beat the p4.
     
  3. Bog

    Bog Losing it...

    Reputations:
    4,018
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Most game developers refer to Intel's embarrassing Pentium 4 in order to describe game requirements. The problem is that the Pentium 4 relies on sheer clock speed for it's performance, while modern CPUs such as the Pentium M, Core Duo, and Core 2 Duo do not. These Pentium M based CPUs are not only dual-core, but they also complete more executions per clock; meaning that they don't need to run at 3GHz to match a P4. As the member above said, even the lowliest Core 2 Duo will beat a top-of-the-line Pentium 4 simply because the architecture design is superior.
     
  4. cumbaya19

    cumbaya19 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    How bout the graphics cards? Rep to both of you
     
  5. cumbaya19

    cumbaya19 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i also keep seeing core quad. Is that better than the 2.26 I have?
     
  6. Bog

    Bog Losing it...

    Reputations:
    4,018
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Performance benefits from quad core CPUs depends on all the elements in the equation. If the game is multi-threaded, then the software will utilize all 4 cores, and that CPU will complete tasks more quickly than a single-core or dual-core CPU.

    Because silicon technology reached the thermal envolope and stretched it's stability years ago with the Pentium 4 architectures, chip makers are relying on cramming in more cores on to a CPU die in order to continue on with the tradition of improving performance. So, for today's games, a quad core CPU is somewhat impractical (for a laptop); but, in time, they will become mainstream as chip makers figure out how to make them run cooler and software developers design their products to execute across multiple threads.

    I believe that ATI's 4650 would rival Nvidia's 9600M, but don't quote me on that. :)
     
  7. cumbaya19

    cumbaya19 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks i also just read the thread about the graphics card explained. I feel like Im set to play games at atleast medium settings for the next 2-3 years