The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    GT 445M is no faster than GT335M ?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by mitsuhide, Aug 6, 2010.

  1. mitsuhide

    mitsuhide Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    109
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i3 350M + GT 445M (GF108 core) ,Default GPU clock , unknow
    3DMark06 1280x768
    7718

    i3 620M + GT 335M (GT200 core) ,Default GPU clock
    3DMark06 1280x768
    7779

    maybe , the GT445M is just a renamed GT335M ( GT200 core and no DX11 support)



    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    (Fermi GF100 core)
    GTX 480M (256bit GDDR5 ,352SP) = Desktop GeForce GTX 465

    (Fermi GF104 core)
    GTX 460M (192bit GDDR5 ,192SP) = Desktop GeForce GTS 450

    (Fermi GF106 core)
    GTS 450M(128bit GDDR5 ,160SP)= Desktop Geforce GT 440

    (Fermi GF108 core)
    GT 445M(128bit GDDR3 ,128SP)= Desktop Geforce GT 430

    (Fermi GF108 core)
    GT 425M (128bit GDDR3 ,96SP)= Desktop Geforce GT 420

    (Fermi GF108 core)
    G405M (64bit GDDR3 ,48 SP)
     
    mitsuhide, Aug 6, 2010
    #1
  2. Phinagle

    Phinagle Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,521
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Phinagle, Aug 6, 2010
    #2
  3. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Yeah, and the GTX 460M should have 240SP too. I have that the GTS 460M is 192-bit w/ 192SP. Either way, by the specs, even the GT 425M should best the GT 335M.
     
    sgogeta4, Aug 6, 2010
    #3
  4. Phinagle

    Phinagle Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,521
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    GTX 460M will be the 192 Core/192-bit part.

    http://forum.notebookreview.com/6500967-post748.html
     
    Phinagle, Aug 6, 2010
    #4
  5. Kevin

    Kevin Egregious

    Reputations:
    3,289
    Messages:
    10,780
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Maybe you should stop basing performance off of 3Dmark06, especially when it's an i3-350M vs an i7-620M.

    CPU Score.... 1981 vs 3121.

    I think maybe that made a little bit of a difference.
     
    Kevin, Aug 6, 2010
    #5
  6. gdansk

    gdansk Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    325
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    41
    So all these cards support Dx11 then? I've read that the GT425M did not, and thus... wasn't Fermi based? Edit: Notebookcheck answered both questions.
     
    gdansk, Aug 6, 2010
    #6
  7. Phinagle

    Phinagle Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,521
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Missed these before....based on clusters of 48 cores I'd have to guess at the counts for these GPUs both being 144. Possibly cut-down GF106, one using GDDR5 the other with GDDR3.
     
    Phinagle, Aug 7, 2010
    #7
  8. Riddhy916

    Riddhy916 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    35
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    41
    when will nvidia release their full mobile g400 series lineup?
    ati will release 6000 series desktop parts in october so mobile 6000 will be jan/feb 2k11 so if nvidia dont release it in september then they only less than 3 to 4 months before new mobile counterparts arrive

    i am also hearing that only gtx 480m/gtx 460m or maybe gts 450m will be the dx 11 parts others will be dx 10 rebranded 300 series.
     
    Riddhy916, Aug 9, 2010
    #8
  9. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    What sources are you hearing this from?
     
    sgogeta4, Aug 9, 2010
    #9
  10. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Look at the MASSIVE difference in CPU scores.

    SERIOUSLY.

    Then look at the SM2 and SM3 composite score.

    So:

    A: 3dmark 06 is an outdated benchmark.

    B: The 445 is scoring 5-10% higher with a 50% slower CPU ANYWAY.

    C: That higher score is in the SM3 tests which are closer to what modern games are going to be running.
     
    Meaker@Sager, Aug 9, 2010
    #10
  11. mitsuhide

    mitsuhide Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    109
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    mitsuhide, Aug 12, 2010
    #11
  12. Phinagle

    Phinagle Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,521
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Well I got the right GPU core and shader count but was off on the memory type. :)

    http://forum.notebookreview.com/6585370-post4.html
     
    Phinagle, Aug 12, 2010
    #12
  13. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    sgogeta4, Aug 12, 2010
    #13