This is a screenshot from the site "chiphell" : the gtx 760M seem to be a great deal, else the 128bit bus, but no problem with that![]()
![]()
edit: can a modo change the title to 768 CCmy mistake..
-
Attached Files:
-
-
It looks like a downclocked Kepler GK106 from the GTX 650 Ti. Not bad.
-
oh man, only if that was 192bit or 256bit. Would have been awesome..
-
A nice bump in performance from the 660m.
-
Indeed but still it will weaker than GTX675m.
-
yeap, i'm waiting for resellers in my country to get laptops with it, i just need from lenovo to get us a lappy with that GPU.. (like the y580) or acer or any normal brand (cause they dont import high end machines cause of the high currency problems)
plus we have a low frequency, it should be easy to get it to 800MHz and 1150Mhz mem, to get an extra perf, especially OC the memory will helpthe gpu in higher resolutions.. -
I wouldn't expect it to match a 675M, but IMO it would perform close to the 670M but at a much lower TDP. For a midrange GPU, that's pretty good.
EDIT: On second thought, maybe a wee bit faster than the 660M, but 10% slower than the 670M. That 128 bit memory bandwidth may be an issue in addition to the low clocked GDDR5. -
Then there's the GTX 765m.
-
Yeah, they will love to pair this GPU with 1366x768 screens haha. It will definitely match 670m or surpass it. The bandwidth difference between the two is not that great, while 760m basically doubled the shader muscle it had. It should be similar, in a way, to a 660m overclocked past the Ghz barrier, which if I remember correctly, matched 670m or so.
-
Oh man, if 765m packs 192bit bus and gets inside 13" lappy with 768 CUDA, I am getting that lappy, period.
-
In case you people haven`t noticed, the GTX 760M comes low clocked from factory, but can GPU Boost way higher than 719MHz. So it can fit inside many thin notebooks because the system will only allow the GPU to clock up to what the system can cool off anyway. Thats the theory of GPU Boost 2.0.
-
One can only dream.
-
i would like to see the 760M or in the best case the 765M on '17 thin laptops such as the razerblade or ultrabooks.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
The 765M we have seen listed on the clevos has 2GB of ram not 3GB......
-
You can't really compare shaders in 670M to shaders in 760M directly. Don't forget, that the 670M is based on Fermi architecture, where shader domain is clocked 2x the chip's base clock, whereas 760M will be based on Kepler architecture, where shader domain is clocked the same as the rest of the chip.
-
I wasn;t, I was comparing directly to Kepler itself with 660m. If everything else remains the same, higher core count at slightly less speed will be similar to very high clockspeed with half the cores. There were people with 660m GPUs that pushed near the 1ghz barrier or more, like with the macbook. At such speeds, the GPU had quite a strong performance, specially against 670m.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Except the rops are running MUCH slower.
-
the GTX 760M with a big OC like 900MHz/1200MHz..
-
768 shaders.. whoa. Maybe 765m in the Clevo 13" will be 960 at 700MHz. Hopefully it overclocks like mad too. I can get over 1300MHz on my 650m with 0.1V bump.
-
That's true. Hopefully GPU-boost can help a bit
-
no news about any laptop equipped with it ? i'm waiting
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Plenty of news in the relevant sections
-
-
it's an increase of 35% over the GTX 660M @ Stock, i think it's gonna be a nice card
(if well priced)
-
What makes you say that? The 675M is a 100w GPU, this is probably no more than a 50w GPU. And who cares really? A baseline, medium-level, GPU that scores 11k GPU in Vantage is amazing.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
It's very typical of a mid range chip in noteboooks and desktops to be the same or slightly weaker than the previous top cards.
GTX 760M rumors, 960CC ?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by sasuke256, May 6, 2013.

