The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Gaming On battery - Huge fps difference why?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Lavitz, May 10, 2008.

  1. Lavitz

    Lavitz Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Hey guys i have been playing alot GRID and today i ran the game on power on max battery in xp. My fps is 11 with battery when i have ac adapter in i get 35. Why is there such a huge difference this was never the case on vista?. In my task bar i have blue power battery and i have set the power to max. My laptop is fairly new. I usually have the power plugged in always but on vista i checked the fps with battery power alone and ac power the fps are about the same 1 -2 fps difference but since i went to xp there is huge fps difference why is that? Have configured the battery power different? HELP!!!!
     
  2. Southpaw

    Southpaw Only a Little Crazy...

    Reputations:
    1,161
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Hmm my acer does that because an automatic power savings option which you have to manually adjust.

    However, that does look like an xp issue. Not enough of an xp guru to say past that...
     
  3. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    It is that way because your drivers downclock the GPU to save power. You can change it if you pull up control utility for the GPU you have (either nVidia or ATI, I don't know what you have).
     
  4. Nocturnal310

    Nocturnal310 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    792
    Messages:
    2,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Go to Power Options in Vista.. Advanced Power settings & Turn off the power saving for Graphic card...mine is under PCI since its Integrated... yours must be PCI-E.
     
  5. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    He's on XP.
     
  6. StormEffect

    StormEffect Lazer. *pew pew*

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Greg hit it right, you open up the Nvidia Control Panel and switch to the powermizer settings, you'll be able to fiddle with it there so that it doesn't downclock.
     
  7. Icaru506

    Icaru506 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    241
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yeah, Powermizer. - Kill it.
     
  8. eleron911

    eleron911 HighSpeedFreak

    Reputations:
    3,886
    Messages:
    11,104
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    While would you want to game on battery? it will drop like a fly.
    Unless you have a very big battery life as standard,expect no more than 1.5 h of gaming if you put it on max performance(ie kill powermizer,set power profile to always on etc).
     
  9. Lavitz

    Lavitz Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    ^^ I was just testing . now i have new problem. Me and my friend with the same specs but the 2 difference are he has 512 mb of ram more then me but i have 512 mb of video ram and he has 256. we both have ddr 2. We both had the same graphics settings exactly. We were playing on USA track his fps never went below 40 mine.. was 30... i was lagging. WHY!!!!!!!!! and i am on xp 32 bit with 169.09 driver he has 174.Huge fps difference ,we are both running on ac. Also when we both finished playing his gpu temp was 61 mine was 88. My laptop is newer with no dust. My room temp is normal.
     
  10. leo_s

    leo_s Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I've read the 169.09 are horrible drivers, i myself use the 174.74 and couldn't be happier
     
  11. StormEffect

    StormEffect Lazer. *pew pew*

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    169.09 is by no means a horrible driver. You read that nowhere, nobody said it.

    174.74 is a new and faster driver though, that is true. 169.09 is several months older, so you'll see a performance boost with 174.74.
     
  12. leo_s

    leo_s Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    That you haven't read doesn't mean no one has, chill out
     
  13. BenLeonheart

    BenLeonheart walk in see this wat do?

    Reputations:
    42
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    174.74 are better. <--- yes thats a period.
     
  14. StormEffect

    StormEffect Lazer. *pew pew*

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Sorry, I have started going off the deep end with spin control. People no longer source things and often make snap judgements based on singular horror stories.

    Right, so...169.09 are old, but I used them for months and they allowed my computer to play Bioshock AND Crysis when I couldn't prior.

    But 174.74 is better. Though I still have a soft spot for 169.25.
     
  15. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    In terms of performance 169.09 might not be the best.

    But overall i would recommend 169.09 straight up
     
  16. LBThorn

    LBThorn Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I agree 169 is good, I myself however have 175
     
  17. Dienekes

    Dienekes Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    does anyone know if the powermizer options in nvidia control panel are on the drivers for my XPS m1730?, i think im on 176.** or something. im gonna check it when im at home, because the XPS has the most abysmal performance on battery, its literally unplayable, so im gonna check that out, i thought i had tried everything, never heard of the powermizer options
     
  18. eleron911

    eleron911 HighSpeedFreak

    Reputations:
    3,886
    Messages:
    11,104
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    LOL,powermizer should be there if you use stock drivers.
    But using stock=using outdated drivers and that`s a fashion no-no ...
     
  19. Dienekes

    Dienekes Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    ahhh thats me out then, im not on stock drivers lol

    uninstalled them the second i got the laptop haha

    also im on vista, i heard that in vista you cant see powermizer in the nvidia control panel.

    i want to look into this, because im interested.
     
  20. eleron911

    eleron911 HighSpeedFreak

    Reputations:
    3,886
    Messages:
    11,104
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Some drivers, using modded infs,have no powermizer,some do.
    You`ll have to ask everyone which driver they have and if it`s featuring the powermizer option.
    I know from experience that 174.82 and 174.93 HAVE IT.