I have a question about a 3440x1440p ultra wide monitor, I want this monitor for productivity but I do also play some games(rainbow six siege, overwatch) . My 980m card can't handle ultra settings on that resolution for what I have read... But I have heard that it will be okey for the 2560x1080p resolution... So, will I get a nice image if I don't play at native resolution? It will treat the game as a 2560x1080p resolution? No stretch or something? I have the same question if I play in a 16:9 .
Thanks for the help
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
-
HaloGod2012 Notebook Virtuoso
Why not drop some not so obvious ( AA, depth of field, occlusion) graphics settings down so you can try and stay at native res ? I would shoot for that, it's a much bigger difference dropping from native res than it is turning some settings down in the game.
Mr Najsman and richardforero like this. -
Is there even a point to anti-aliasing at resolutions beyond 1080p (or even at 1080p)?
Plus, is there a point to gaming at Ultra settings at any game?
High settings seem to be more than enough in terms of visual prowess (there appears to be little to no difference between High and Ultra - except in minor things that are not even noticeable when you are actually gaming, and the premise that Ultra is far more harder on the hardware vs High). -
-
there's no way a 980M is gonna be able to run games with max settings at 3440x1440. my 1080 even has trouble doing that on my Dell U3415W.
i run everything on a mix of high and ultra settings with AA off. u don't need to worry about AA at higher resolutions.
P.S. - Overwatch still doesn't have 3440x1440 support yet because they're a bunch of dummies. check out 'Flawless Widescreen' and download it if it supports games that u will be playing in ultra wide.1nstance likes this. -
killkenny1 Too weird to live, too rare to die.
-
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
deks i created a thread about this post in there
-
it'll still look great because of the higher resolution, extra immersive feeling, and extra screen real estate. it's not all about gaming with a 21:9 screen. i just love the everyday usability of it.richardforero likes this. -
From my experience, a single 1080 is not enough to maxed out demanding games in 3440 x 1440.
-
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
From a fellow ultrawide user, expect to run med/high for most games.
As for your above question, for it to take advantage of the higher refresh rate, yes. -
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
-
Sorry to ask many questions, but it's a big amount of money for a monitor, and want to feel good with the monitor for quite long time.
Thanks for the answer.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkLast edited: Aug 5, 2016 -
I really like my ultrawide and I think its good for productivity, you can effectively run 2 windows with no problem. IMO -
productivity will be 10 times better on a 21:9 compared to a 1080p monitor. it's like having dual monitors, but without the borders. there's also programs that u can download that'll help u set custom partions. -
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Gaming on a 3440x1440p with a 980m
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by richardforero, Aug 2, 2016.