The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Gaming performance vs. Resolution

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Mobile Pimpium, Aug 18, 2006.

  1. Mobile Pimpium

    Mobile Pimpium Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    When shopping for a laptop with a mid range graphics card, ala the x1600, is it advisable to choose the laptop with the screen that has a lower resolution?

    For example
    Laptop#1 15.4" screen, 1280x800, x1600 256mb
    Laptop#2 15.4" screen, 1440x900, x1600 256mb

    All the rest of the specs being the same would laptop #1 play games more fluid and at higher detail settings? Or could you scale down the resolution on Laptop #2 and play the games at the same detail while retaining native resolution like quality?

    I think I know the answer, but I just wanted to make sure.

    -MP
     
  2. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Depends. Yes, the first laptop would play more games more fluid at the full resolution. But that's not for all games. Quake 3 would play maxed out on either of them ;) You can also just deal with the interpolation of scaling a lower resolution to the 1440x900 screen, especially since most cards will scale without changing the aspect ratio any more (FINALLY!). It depends on whether you think you'll need the extra desktop space of the 1440x900, and if you think the pixels would be too tiny ;) I'd be inclined to go with the higher res myself if I were going to get a 15.4". I had a 1280x800 in a 15.4". While it was a nice laptop overall, the pixels always just seemed too big to me. I'm getting a 1280x800 in a 14.1" factor next.
     
  3. Charles P. Jefferies

    Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    22,339
    Messages:
    36,639
    Likes Received:
    5,091
    Trophy Points:
    931
    This really depends on the game itself as Pitabred posted. Generally, the X1600 is powerful enough that it can play most games at a 1440x900 (keep in mind a lot of games don't support that resolution, but they can be made to - www.widescreengamingforum.com), but with the exception of some newer games (Oblivion, FEAR).
    If possible, I would go for the WXGA+ (1440x900) screen. You'll appreciate the extra screen real estate when it comes to web surfing and other general tasks.
     
  4. Thaenatos

    Thaenatos Zero Cool

    Reputations:
    1,581
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Well with a modern game that just came out yes the first would play more smoothly. Granted you could take the 2nd down to the same res, but lower then native res looks like poo. But the x1600 is a beefy card so it will be able to handle that res in most games.