-
-
I do not have either, but when the 7970m came out, if I remember correctly, the nearest was the 680m. Still is is I have any memory in my brain. But my memory is not guaranteed to be correct. Just saw the 670mx part, instead of the 670m.... So let me check. Or someone with a working memory can chime in...
-
Definitely the 7970M. 13.x drivers fixed most issues on my friend's P150EM. Even with Enduro issues, it is still significantly faster. See notebookcheck for rankings and benchmarks.
-
After a bit of research, it would seem to be below the 7970m. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX - Notebookcheck.net Tech
-
Thanks for the replies. I thought the 670mx was faster... Learn something everyday ...
-
failwheeldrive Notebook Deity
Yeah, the most similar gpu to the 7970m is the 680m. The stock 7970m actually performs better on benchmarks than the stock 680m. Once you start overclocking, the 680m pulls ahead though. -
thanks for the replies guys :hi2:
-
niffcreature ex computer dyke
You should be asking about the 675mx. I'm little curious about that one.
-
failwheeldrive Notebook Deity
The 675mx is a great card, but it's still not comparable with a 7970m. It's more stable, but the 7970m wins in terms of performance. -
Not even close. The 7970M just blows it out of the water. We should be talking about the 680M, but we've got a great thread about that... right about everywhere on NBR
-
GTX 670MX is poop. Its a chocked GPU made by Nvidia intentionally just to have two GPUs to offer. 675MX is the real deal
Its like a competition where two equally powerful pumps connected to a water reservoir where the 670MX have a 10cm diameter pipe it can shoot water through while 675MX have 50cm pipe. -
Notebookcheck have done a review on all GPUs. There is 15% difference between 675MX and 7970M over 14games. If you pair the 7970M with AMD CPU, it chokes that poor GPU and performs in average a little more than 660M.
-
failwheeldrive Notebook Deity
Wow, the 7970m really can't reach its potential in the GX60
Too bad you can't drop an i7 in there
-
I guess the A10-4600M isn't just bad, is really bad... Making the HD7970M perform only slightly better than a GTX 660M...
-
This is true at the lower resolutions, but the higher resolutions tend to even things out a little. Still kinda painful to see this though. >_> AMD can't even make a CPU fast enough to keep up with its best GPU.
-
niffcreature ex computer dyke
Okay, that doesn't make any sense, unless there is something I'm missing it will still perform just as well as any other 7970m on tasks that dont stress the CPU, like furmark. -
Of course in Furmark the type of CPU used doesn't really affect much, as it's purely a GPU stress test program... If we talk about gaming, CPU is usually highly stressed in morden games like BF3's multiplayer mode, Hawken, Batman:AC, Crysis 2 and Crysis 3 (alpha) etc. And a weak CPU is going to limit these modern games from getting the most out of the HD7970M, what you'll be seeing here is a low % of GPU utilization. The choice between an i7 and an A10 is going to greatly affect how the game will perform on your HD7970M.
Like in this example (notice that the A10 stutters a lot): AnandTech - AMD's Radeon HD 7970M: Ivy Bridge vs. Trinity Video
The following example also shows a clear evidence that the A10 is a huge bottleneck to the HD7970M: http://forum.notebookreview.com/gaming-software-graphics-cards/694709-7970m-amd-cpu-vs-7970m-intel-cpu.html#post8919585
Does it make more sense now?
GeForce GTX670MX vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by LegendaryLegend, Jan 20, 2013.