The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Geforce G210M vs Mobility Radeon 4570

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Peon, Oct 13, 2009.

  1. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Short version: Which is faster?

    Long version: Are there any benchmarks?
     
    Peon, Oct 13, 2009
    #1
  2. Cobra03

    Cobra03 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    178
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Cobra03, Oct 13, 2009
    #2
  3. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Dang. I was hoping that there would finally be something better than the F6Ve in the ultraportable gaming category.
     
    Peon, Oct 13, 2009
    #3
  4. TexasEx7

    TexasEx7 Meat Popsicle

    Reputations:
    445
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Ultraportable gaming? Are you high?
     
    TexasEx7, Oct 14, 2009
    #4
  5. dukka

    dukka Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    two guys ask the same question in the same day. The 4570 is a little faster as Cobra said.
    I think unless you expect a ultraportable that can play crysis fluently at highest setting, the Asus F6Ve is pretty enough for today's gaming need.
     
    dukka, Oct 14, 2009
    #5
  6. jk6959

    jk6959 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The G210m is a little lower i think, the only stats I have seen for it were from some Taiwanese review of the Asus UL80VT (su7300 g210m)
    which got 3.2-3.35k in 3dmark06 (1.3-1.7ghz)
    compared to 3.7-4k 3dmark06 with 4570

    but if you interpolate the CPU results to being normal processor amount then they should be pretty similar
    However, the 4570 is gddr3, while I'm not sure if they're using ddr3 or gddr3 in the g210m in the ul80vt

    So that's a lot of excuses for their scores, but with the same shaders and speeds assuming gddr3, then there shouldn't be much difference, and we notebookcheck doesn't tell what the real current consumption is for the ATI so can't compare there (12-15 plus possibly 5 for chipset for ATI // 14 for Nvidia)
     
    jk6959, Oct 14, 2009
    #6
  7. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    I asked first :p

    Anyways, it's not that I have any specific complaints about the F6Ve or the 4570, it's just that I'm always looking for newer technology that beats what's available today.
     
    Peon, Oct 14, 2009
    #7
  8. ubersonic

    ubersonic Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Hey guys, just thought id point out that this is wrong the G210M beats the 4570, the benchmarks notebookcheck have for the 210M are only an estimation they havent actually tested it yet, it gets 4-5000 in 3dMark06 depending on the CPU its paired with
     
    ubersonic, Nov 13, 2009
    #8
  9. crash

    crash NBR Assassin

    Reputations:
    2,221
    Messages:
    5,540
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    206
    crash, Nov 13, 2009
    #9