At CES, Lenovo intruduced their Y580 which is equipped with a gtx 660m.
IdeaPad Y580 Specs, Reviews, & Latest News | Lenovo | The Verge
A huge upgrade from the gimp gt 555m from the y570, same thickness at 1.4 in and same weight at 5.95 lbs
I tried to look up the gtx 660m and apparently its the "successor" to the 560m, not necessarily rebranded. according to Nvidia 28nm Mobile GPU Plans Revealed | Best Gaming Laptop
the gtx 660m would score 14,000 on 3d mark vantage.
When this comes out is this the best graphcis card you can get for a 6 pound machine?
-
-
If this were true it would finally mean that one could buy a laptop and be able to play the newest games at high settings, without having to pay a fortune for it and fear of overheating components.
-
In only a matter of less than a year, my GTX 460m is obsolete. -
-
14k vantage? thats 6990M at stock!
-
i thought there was going to be no 6xx from nvidia. i call bs on this.
-
-
because 660 is close to 666 which is the number of the beat and the owner of Nvidia is christian? nuff said
-
guess we just wait and see
-
It doesn't make sense for a notebook to start at $900 and then give you an optional 660m upgrade for free does it? More likely $900 is for the base model and you you'll have to pay quite a bit to upgrade the GPU and CPU. -
i like how its much lighter than an asus g53 and an msi 663 and slightly less than the clevo p150hm. I don't like how its still pretty thick.
A newgen gpu 660m comparable to a last gen 580m and 6990m which is pretty cool and very beleivable. this just means that msi,clevo,asus,alienware will have anywhere from a 660m-680m on their machines just like they are currently. -
-
Here are the different models Lenovo is releasing:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/08/lenovo-ideapad-laptops-CES-2012 -
Wrong post. Please delete this one.
-
-
im not sure of the exact reasoning but probably because nvidia previous released a bunch of 6xx chipsets. -
-
I'd have to see it to believe it. 660m having almost 2x the performance of a 560m is too good to be true, as much as I'd like it to be.
-
does not sound so good to me am getting 10250 vantage point on my 5850 with a simple I Q740 cpu. How can 14000 be twice the power of the 560?
-
-
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
-
-
-
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 - Notebookcheck.net Tech
The 560M GTX is around 8k GPU score
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M - Notebookcheck.net Tech
But of course these are just benchmarks. Real world performance is what counts. -
You should be able to expect at least 50% more performance from a new generation, because keep in mind this isn't like the 4XX --> 5XX series transition. This is more like 2XX --> 4XX, which represented a fairly big leap in performance. I don't have the numbers and don't plan to look them up, but you can do so easily enough to confirm (or refute) that assertion.
So imho the GTX 660M should perform anywhere from 40% to 50% better than its predecessor, the GTX 560M.
EDIT: So I looked up the numbers and it's anywhere from 30-50%. Also, an interesting trend: the GTX 460M met or exceeded performance of GTX 280M, and the GTX 560M met or exceeded the performance of the GTX 480M. Notice anything? I wouldn't be surprised to see a GTX 660M that competes evenly with the GTX 580M. -
Notebookcheck.net Tech is totally fake
according to my score my GPU score is 9700 -
GTX 560M, 8-9k in average
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M - Notebookcheck.net Tech
5850, 5.3-5.8k in average
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 - Notebookcheck.net Tech
EDIT: Too slow -
But I was under the impression everyone is talking about stock clock rates. -
OC i get 10250 and this is all with a old Q740 cpu. If 660GTX gets 10k unclocked with a newer CPU i can still beat it with my clocks which is just sad -
-
hat is the DDR3 version of the 5850 which is almost twice as slow and i guess maybe that website notebookcheck uses the DDR3 version for their teste as well, than stuff makes a little more sense.
It still however does not jutify that the 660 will score only 10.000 i think it will be more like 13-14k unclocked -
Yea i agree. If it only scores 10k, whats the point of the new generation? the 660m scoring the same as 580m/6990m makes perfect sense.
-
-
as i said Notebookcheck is fake i get 8200 unclocked and 10250 with stable gaming clock
-
link and screenshot please. But really? is this what this topic is about?
-
http://imageshack.us/f/215/10451gpuvantage.png/
check score 5850M
over 10k on GPU -
anyway as soon as 680M is out there an upgrade is in order
-
-
the only notable increases in the nvidia line up were the 8800gtx and 485m, everything in between has been an incremental increase in mhz.
i kinda find it hard to believe that we will have such an increase so soon after the 485m. -
However the time between the GTX 485M and 580M was <= 6 months, whereas the time between 480M and 580M was around 1 year. Less time between releases doesn't necessarily correlate directly with the amount of development time, but there is certainly a relationship there.
Additionally, the 580M is essentially an overclocked 485M imo, and offers performance fitting that description. It has nearly identical architecture from my (admittedly uninformed) point of view. Furthermore its 3dmark vantage scores are <10% greater than the 485M, which are the sorts of gains I achieved when I overclocked my GTX 260M.
What I'm trying to say is that we're not just going to see an overclocked 580M when we finally lay our hands on GTX 600 GPUs. Instead we will find an entirely new (presumably better) architecture with corresponding gains in performance.
EDIT:
- Differences between 8800M GTX, 9800M GTX, GTX 260M, 280M, and 285M were marginal. But the leap from all of those to the GTX 4XX series was much more substantial.
- GTX 4XX to 5XX might not have been a big deal, but I wager that just as the 8/9/200 ---> 4XX transition was pretty significant, the 4XX ---> 6XX transition will be similarly major.
- If I were to speculate further, I'd say that 6XX ---> 7XX transition will be like 4XX ---> 5XX, ie gains of no more than 15-20%, but that the next leap to 8XX (if they keep the naming scheme) (this'd be Maxwell, I presume) would be a pretty big deal.
It's like Intel's tick-tock cycle, if you look at it from this point of view. -
about the difference I also believe it will be a good one (well above 20% for all respective cards), but to hope that the GTX560M which scores 8k in vantage, will score 14k as GTX660M, is I think being too optimistic, that means it will be somehow 75% boosted with the same power consumption? Kepler is not this big of news, Kepler will offer similar performance at lower power consumption, after all this is what Nvidia claims, they should know it better then we do, right? -
There will also be GTX 670m, 675m and 680m
-
A 675M would be really awkward
-
-
Because you can overclock it and have a 680m..
Anyway Memory Interface: 660m 126bit, 670m 192bit, 675m/680m 256bit -
-
Sort of but the 680m certainly has more headroom to overclock more
-
its highly unlikely to have a 6x5 card, they only made 485m to make up for the lost flagship 480m couple of years back. i think in naming they will just go with the normal 660, 670 and 680 mobile series like the 5xx series.
-
And that screenshot is not from you. It is from DaneGRClose and it have been posted here FS/FT: Alienware M15x Lunar Silver, 1080p, i5, 5850 - [H]ard|Forum
Gtx 660m
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Oats04, Jan 11, 2012.