NVIDIA Readies GK104-based GeForce GTX 680M for Computex | techPowerUp
EDIT: i apologize for making two thread.i think there is a problem with my internet or the forum.
-
-
Its already been posted bud.
http://forum.notebookreview.com/8523570-post1168.html -
sorry i didn't see it.i will look harder next time before posting.
-
Np at all. Thought I'd let you know that someone (actually I think Cloudfire linked that exact article) already.
Plus the forums are wonky right now so good luck searching lol. -
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
this seems to be gaining momentum from reputable sites...the 7970m eats this card alive
-
Just got to wait and see, speculation is pointless.
I think everyone will be surprised if the 680m does not match or beat the 7970m, Nvidia normally does not accept second place. -
Based on a leaked 3DMark 11 image? Jump to conclusions much? lol. Wait until reviewers have final silicon + drivers in their hand and put up gaming benchmarks.
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
i don't jump to conclusions...but i see this reported more and more on so-called reputable websites. They could be all wrong
Let me rephrase:
IF this is the 680m that will be released, the 7970m will eat it alive -
Even if this screenshot was an accurate representation of its 3dmark 11 performance, it would in no way reflect actual gaming performance. So again, you're drawing far too many conclusions. I understand you love your 7970M but you may end up eating your words in a month or two.
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
Bro...i really hope that by september, the real 680m or whatever it will be called is released so that i can buy it...and i hope that it destroys the 7970m so it gives me an upgrade path. This cut down version that scores 4900 will not beat the 7970m.
you seem to think that i'm an ati fanboy...I'm not. I am a video card enthusiast that would be disappointed if this is what nvidia gives us -
Im not trying to wum, but we have seen already that generally desktop wise the new gpus are similar performance per watt so I expect nvidia and amd to be very close.
-
All the reputable sites that people are mentioning don`t know anything more than what we do. The score they are posting is the 680M overclocked. Later rumors said that Nvidia ditched this card when they saw how powerful the 7970M was.
From the SOURCE of this content which I was the first one to write about in the beginning of April. Here is the source
DELLÐÂAlienware M17x 2012ÐÂÒ»´úδ·¢²¼ÍâÐÇÈ˱¾Alienware M17x-R4µýÕÕ/ÐÔÄÜ/ÅÜ·Ö/ÅäÖÃÆØ¹â_´÷¶ûAlienwareÍâÐÇÈËÂÛ̳
-
why would they even use a half gk104... why not the whole thing, its like the 480m all over again... !
-
Yeah it doesn`t make any sense. As you can see from the source, the first 680M was a GK106, we now know that 680M is a GK104 so they must have changed it. We even have proof confirming a GK104.
Question is wether they just cut the 680 in half which I along with many think would be stupid because they already have a massive shortage with GTX 680s. Why on earth would they use those chips on notebooks? And it would, like Slickdude says, most likely fall behind 7970M
I don`t know, the whole thing is confusing
Gtx680m
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Fatal1ty39, May 17, 2012.