The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    How are mobile and desktop cards different?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by johncolazabal, Jul 13, 2010.

  1. johncolazabal

    johncolazabal Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    How different is the ATI Radeon HD 3650 Mobile than the desktop HD 3650?

    Just wanted to know since im getting an hd 3650
     
  2. Manic Penguins

    Manic Penguins [+[ ]=]

    Reputations:
    777
    Messages:
    1,493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The difference between the two cards should be very noticeable. Mobile cards just don't compare to fully fledged desktop cards.

    They are both very weak cards, scoring less than 1k in 3DMark Vantage. Mobile getting around 710 and desktop getting 891, stats from ORB.
     
  3. Deks

    Deks Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,272
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Chip sizes are essentially identical.
    The only difference is they cripple the mobile ones on purpose and charge a heck of a lot more due to portability.
    That, and the surface area on a desktop gpu is larger, giving the cards room for more heat dissipation and desktop cards have usually higher clocks.

    As for 3650m in contrast to the desktop 3650 ... the differences are not that big actually.
    ATI in it's 3xxx series essentially named their gpu's properly and not like Nvidia.
    I think the only difference between those 2 cards is the clock speeds and bandwidth.
    The mobile one would be weaker, but by about 25 to 50% (cannot be sure though).
     
  4. Fishsticks

    Fishsticks Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    32
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Deks is right, the Mobility version is merely a downclocked version, with similar core config, memory support, bus width, etc, but the Desktop version has support for some of the newer APIs following a driver release.

    Might be worth it to flash your G-card with the desktop driver.. something we pull off quite a lot with nVidia's products, not sure if AMD/ATI works the same.

    Nevertheless, the Mobility HD 3650 is not that bad a choice for a graphics card, you'd be able to run higher spec games on lower details fluidly. I think it matches up to the 8600M or 9600M.

    Personally, I wouldn't shell out $130 on the 3650... depending on what you need, and what your budget is, maybe I could suggest another model?
     
  5. HsKDaMiAnz

    HsKDaMiAnz Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Mobility Cards are factory clocked lower than those of the desktop to help prevent overheating.

    That would make the 3650 far stronger and faster than the 4530, seeing the 4530 is only a little better than the 8400m.