The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    How good is IGP gaming?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Peon, Mar 19, 2010.

  1. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    How good are the latest laptop IGPs from Intel, AMD, and Nvidia at gaming? I've heard that the Arrandale IGP delivers "decent" performance, but are we talking about the same old 20-30 fps at 1024x768 with all settings on minimum that we've been seeing for much of the past 5 years, or is it truly decent* this time around?

    * By decent, I mean a constant 40+ fps on the most demanding games available with all settings on medium at native resolution, which is always higher than 1024x768 these days.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015
  2. Amnesiac

    Amnesiac 404

    Reputations:
    1,312
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Nope. Expect Low settings at a slightly higher resolution than before, they haven't really improved. A 3DMark score of 2000 in 06 still pretty much implies that most games will be low settings at 1280 x 800 or similar, depending on the game.

    Honestly, if you are even thinking about gaming, I would at least get a dedicated card. You will regret getting an IGP for even light gaming (remember, subjective term, just generalizing though), as they are really not built for anything intensive at all.
     
  3. SoundOf1HandClapping

    SoundOf1HandClapping Was once a Forge

    Reputations:
    2,360
    Messages:
    5,594
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    206
    I finished Crysis with a Radeon 3200.

    With resolution 800x600, everything low as possible, and average FPS of maybe 25.

    I am, apparently, a masochist.
     
  4. weinter

    weinter /dev/null

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,798
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    IMO Arrandale is still not good enough...their drivers are not as optimized for DirectX as Nvidia and ATi's IGP.
    In Nvidia/ATi's IGP dropping resolution/Image quality brings up good performance but not so much for Intel IGP.
     
  5. DEagleson

    DEagleson Gamer extraordinaire

    Reputations:
    2,529
    Messages:
    3,107
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Recommend getting a mid range card at least, but IGPs can play games, but not "decent * "

    * By decent, I mean a constant 40+ fps on the most demanding games available with all settings on medium at native resolution, which is always higher than 1024x768 these days. xD
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015
  6. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    at least if you get a decent (even integrated) nvidia or ati chip, dropping the visuals will increase performance, so you can make the compromise yourself between visuals vs performance.

    with the intel chip, you will be struggling to get the game to work and be playable at low settings and low resolution.
     
  7. SomeRandomDude

    SomeRandomDude Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    71
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I used to have an old VAIO with a 950 GMA. And it was BAD. I had to use 3DAnalyze to play almost anything at lowest settings with 20fps (I went through Doom 3 like that). It had Pixel Shader 2.0, No Vertex Shader and no HW T&L.