Check out this link guys...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4yx2wKA5do
Unreal
-
Somehow, I don't think that is real. Perhaps there was another notebook right next to him, or something...but those settings and that card are unrealistic.
-
Sneaky_Chopsticks Notebook Deity
What n00bish stuff.lol...XD...
Now for seriousness- That's virtually impossible...maybe he replaced it with a top notch card and renamed it? -> IS that even possible? -
Yeah my 7600 would only play as well as that, at those settings... I know for a fact that the x200 can play Fear well at low-medium settings, but those settings seem a little high... But you never know!
-
That game play looks better then mines....
-
His results don't seem that outlandish, especially at those relatively low settings, particularly the 800x600, minimum shaders and no shadows. (my desktop x1800xt averages 96 FPS at the listed settings). I also think his average (he says 18-24 FPS) is mostly because half the video is just him walking through empty corridors.
-
Could be just another ati card with an edited bios to detect another series. You could have a Go7200 and change it to read Go7950GTX if you wanted.
I think something is definitely up though. Yes, those are relatively lowish settings, but still too high a bar for an X200. I have run FEAR on an X200, and it ran only at very lowish settings, with maybe the odd option on medium - definitely no AA or AF or it would crash and die completely!! -
Was that a desktop X200? It looks like a CRT monitor. I also noticed in the game setup that the graphics card was detected as "custom".
-
I believe x200 can pull that performance at 800x600. Check the situation when he shoots the replica soldier - it comes down to 1-2 fps.
I actually started FEAR at 640x480 with GMA900 - it started and if I was patient I could play. I was quite surprised.
Cheers,
Ivan -
it says dx8 shaders perhaps thats why it runs?
-
AlexOnFyre Needs to get back to work NBR Reviewer
That had to be a CRT, because LCDs don't flicker when videotaped like that. but it could have been a CRT attached to a notebook, so that doesn't mean anything.
-
Seems perfectly fine... all settings turned down.
My friend runs CSS on an x200 with a few tweaks and low res you can get playable fps easily. -
It was a desktop. Look at the description of the video:
Pentium D 2.8GHz
2GB DDR2
ATi x200 with 256MB shared
He's also using no volumetric lighting, no shadows, medium textures, and 800x600. I'd say that would be possible on a desktop x200 especially if it had 128MB dedicated. Notice that the framerates still aren't that consistent either. -
Yeah id defo say its one of the rare X200's with 128mb dedicated memory.. the dedicated memory results in a substantial performance increase over other X200's.. (30%
..
How is this possible???
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Fishy, May 22, 2007.