The title explains it all...
Hello all
Now, will Star Wars Battlefront II work on an Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 (eek!)? My notebook is a Compaq Presario V6412TU, going to be mainly used for schoolwork, I wouldn't mind the prospect of playing some of my favourite games on it. The SWB2 system requirements don't seem to mention GMA 950 in the graphics arena, so let me guess: it won't play on my notebook?
If that options gone, would it be worth it buying SW Battlefront 1 for it? I enjoy both games...SWB2 would be better though.
Thank you!
-
It MIGHT run at the lowest possible settings and resolution. And even then, the fps will be crap. You should save your money or buy a console.
-
moon angel Notebook Virtuoso NBR Reviewer
The first one might at lowest settings but I wouldn't hold your breath. I doubt the second one will run at all playably.
-
Intel GMA950 rocks!!!!! Saves battery power and is way lower in heat/fan. Of course I game on an Xbox 360 so my point is mute
-
AmazingGracePlayer Notebook Deity
If there's a demo for the game, you could always try the demo...
-
i run F.E.A.R. on medium on a 945gma idk if that helps
-
-
Agent CoolBlue Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer
-
It should run FEAR at about 800x600 with low settings with a playable 15-25 FPS. Seeing as how FEAR is more demanding than Battlefront II, in theory, it should work fine, though coding varies from game to game. Worst case scenario, it will be playable at 640x480.
-
Agent CoolBlue Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer
Can it run on medium? I don't think so...
-
On the X3100, I can run Fear at High/Medium, but I should absolutely turn off Shadow in the Advanced Menu.
So maybe the GMA950 can play at Low/Medium with Shadurn Turned Off. -
-
-
-
-
Ok well thanks for the replies. I guess my answer is no.
-
I have an acer notebook with core duo (2@ 2.0Ghz), 1 Gb of ram and intel 945gm chip with gma 950.
i can run battlefront ii at a playable level with the details on max and at 1440x900 res. unfortunately, during certain space battles the game crashes suddenly. also the textures on the ground in levels like hoth and geonosis are replaced by black ground.
the game runs fine otherwise, i'm trying to fix the other problems with 3d analyzer, but no luck yet... -
Stop lying
-
Its clear many people commenting here dont own the GMA950 or Battlefield II.
Yes the GMA 950 DOES run Battlefierld II perfectly fine with low/med setting.
I also have played FEAR with the GMA950 on a core 2 Duo laptop ay 640x480 with some details enabled and it play very well.
Pwhdavey, Yes it will run it OK. My previous laptop had the GMA950 and yes I tried that game on it awhile ago -
lol if ur GMA950 can play FEAR maybe il try with my ati x1270
probably max! xD
-
the x1270 will run FEAR but again at 640x480.
-
moon angel Notebook Virtuoso NBR Reviewer
my x200m runs FEAR at 800*600 lowest but it is stuttery when there's a lot of action.
-
IMO its better to play at lower resolution and have details higher. Looks much better.
-
http://youtube.com/watch?v=qnoaZ55gUwg
This user claims he can play FEAR without lag on GMA900. Do some games work better with GMA graphics or is it a fixed thing.
Intel GMA 950 - the choice I regret
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Pwhdavey, Aug 28, 2007.