The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6490M

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by T-bro, Jul 31, 2011.

  1. T-bro

    T-bro Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I was wondering if these two graphics cards have the same performance despite the GDDR RAM in the Radeon.

    If for instance I buy a laptop with the Intel HD Graphics 3000 and just add 1GB RAM to the laptop will it perform the same if I just got a laptop with the AMD Radeon HD 6490M graphics card?
     
  2. Zapperpower

    Zapperpower Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    111
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
  3. Bill Nye

    Bill Nye Know Nothing

    Reputations:
    226
    Messages:
    2,515
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Do you mean the Macbook Pro? I don't think there's another laptop in existence that makes use of the odd 6490m.

    I guess there's the DV6t, but the 6770m is a $25 upgrade that anyone would be completely mad out of their mind to pass up. On the other hand, Apple charges $300.
     
  4. T-bro

    T-bro Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Thanks for your replies.
    Not a Macbook.. I'm comparing graphics between the Dell Latitude E5520 and the HP Probook 5430s.
    I really like the Latitude and it's mostly likely I'll buy it, but the graphics are bugging me.. I don't intend to play a lot of games on this laptop but I would like to play at least some old games. Will the Intel HD Graphics 3000 be up for the job?
     
  5. Micaiah

    Micaiah Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,333
    Messages:
    1,915
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    66
    The base 15" Macbook Pro has the 6490M.
     
  6. sr1650nx

    sr1650nx Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    101
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    For old games and even new games (albeit at some reduced settings), the Intel graphics will be just fine. It's actually a pretty capable integrated card.
     
  7. Karamazovmm

    Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!

    Reputations:
    2,365
    Messages:
    9,422
    Likes Received:
    200
    Trophy Points:
    231
    its not a very good card, its about as fast as the old gt 330m, specially the lower clocked versions that were in the vaio Z and the macbooks
     
  8. Bobmitch

    Bobmitch Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    247
    Messages:
    2,038
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Intel HD graphics is good for DX10. AMD 5000 / 6000 series cards are DX11 capable.
     
  9. Bullit

    Bullit Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    122
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    31
    HD3000 is just the worse GPU possible. If you do only Office and some light stuff no problem, but today even web can push a card to the max. Go for AMD card. The difference is significative.
     
  10. Karamazovmm

    Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!

    Reputations:
    2,365
    Messages:
    9,422
    Likes Received:
    200
    Trophy Points:
    231
    seriously web?
     
  11. R3d

    R3d Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,515
    Messages:
    2,382
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    66
    The HD3000 is actually pretty capable compared to past iGPUs. It can handle pretty much anything on the web easily, and even play some modern games at low settings and low resolutions.

    But yeah, the 6490m is better, though it's still pretty weak.
     
  12. Bigsmoke

    Bigsmoke Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Should this iGPU make me rethink about buying a Dell Latitude E5520? Sadly this laptop doesn't have any other graphics card available :/
     
  13. Bigsmoke

    Bigsmoke Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    One other question.
    Can you guys give me a couple of examples of what this graphics card can or can't run (which games, programs etc.)
     
  14. serialk11r

    serialk11r Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    70
    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I can run Sanctioned Renegades, a silly free fps game 1920x1080 max settings pretty good. And this is with my X220, which isn't able to Turbo much since it has heat issues. Battlefield 2142 runs great, I am downloading BFBC2 which I only expect to run at low settings. I can say that my 512MB Nvidia GT240 (desktop, with an E6400) is somewhat more capable than my i5-2410m laptop, but not by much. At any rate the very low end dedicated graphics are only going to be barely faster.

    Also you might want to look into the "eGPU experiences" thread.
     
  15. jedisolo

    jedisolo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    155
    Messages:
    933
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I was playing the The Witcher 2 on this card(HD 3000).
     
  16. XX55XX

    XX55XX Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    38
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    How was it? I can't see it performing very well.
     
  17. Bigsmoke

    Bigsmoke Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    So the performance of the HD 3000 depends on how fast of a processor you have and how much RAM you have?
     
  18. Deks

    Deks Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,272
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    331
    HD3000 is roughly 38% slower than my gpu (9600m Gt GDDR3) on stock clocks if the benchmarks are to be taken into account.

    While that's not exactly 'stellar', it's also not terrible.
    For an integrated gpu, performance is good.

    And since you mentioned you'll be playing mostly old games anyways (define 'old'), you shouldn't have issues, hypothetically.
    :D
     
  19. Bullit

    Bullit Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    122
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    31
    People change. In 3 years the op will be playing the same games?
     
  20. huai

    huai Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Not quite - all standard voltage Sandy Bridge CPUs have the HD3000 component clocked to 650 mhz base - 1200 max turbo boost. If you get a low voltage processor like in the samsung series 9 or in the macbook air, the HD3000 will be down clocked to 350 mhz base - 1000 turbo boost.

    Amount of Video Ram does not affect performance directly. It's only used for storing textures for processing. I think that HD3000 does not have enough processing power to render quickly enough to ever make use of more than 256-512 mb of video ram.