Here is sortable comparison list of over 20 notebooks, some people might find it useful
http://www.laptopforgaming.com/top-gaming-laptops
-
You kind of posted that before:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=148866&highlight=top+gaming+notebooks
Plus, you may want to know that most of the information about the weight/battery life is totally wrong, taken from the companies's sites most probably.
The Asus V1 (Jp/S) is 6.5 lbs with the DVD.
Area-51 m5550 is 7 lbs. (that should be checked out... not AW's site)
Sager NP5760 and Sager 5790 are both the Clevo M570RU so...
Sager NP2090 (Compal IFL90) is 7 lbs (9 cell), if you want to get 3-4h
Vostro 1500/Inspiron 1520 is 7.4 lbs with the 9 cell battery if you want 3-4h
.....................etc.
Oh, why on earth am I writing that?
Thanks for the efforts anyways. -
I am not sure if this was posted earlier, but I found this page which compares graphics cards. Not sure how accurate it is though.
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html
Does the performance of a card vary between notebooks from different manufacturers even if the configuration is the same? -
Yeah, that's one of the worst source of information about GPU's performance ever...
GPU performance depends on many things such as clock speed (vary between manufacturers), amount/type of dedicated memory (DDR2 or GDDR3), memory bus (128 bit or crippled 64 bit...)..etc.
Plus, if you run a benchmark like 3DMark in lower resolution (as notebookcheck does sometimes) you get higher numbers... so, it should be apples-to-apples-comparison.
Oh, and synthetic benchmarks are called "synthetic" for a reason, in other words they are useful only to a certain degree... then we have real life gaming performance. -
Then most of notebook reviews posted by people have wrong information
-
Actually, it's always good to do your "homework" unless you want to get screwed up.
Little comparison list
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by 8104, Oct 5, 2007.