The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Low performance due to shared memory

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by RazorPhoenicia, Aug 15, 2007.

  1. RazorPhoenicia

    RazorPhoenicia Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I recently got a G1S-A1 with 4GB of total memory. Vista Premium itself only recognizes 3GB of that memory. However, it is the the amount of SHARED memory that the 8600M GT is using that concerns me. Initially, it was using 1256 MB of SHARED MEMORY. (Wasn't it's Turbocache only for 512MB?!)

    When I tested it out using graphics benchmarks, the system scored significantly lower than expected. After some consulting, it seems that huge amount of slower shared memory Turbocache uses is the problem. So, I tried to disable it with Rivatuner. ... Unfortunately, it still uses 767 MB of SHARED MEMORY.

    So once again I need some consulting -- that why I'm turning to you great tech-savvy people. Any help/ideas would be greatly appreciated.
     
  2. hlcc

    hlcc Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    113
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    what graphics benchmarks at what resolution and with what result?
     
  3. RazorPhoenicia

    RazorPhoenicia Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I relied on 3D Mark 05 and 06 to gage the graphics performance.
    The tests were run at 1280 x 1024 (default settings that can't be changed in the free versions).

    The scores that I got were:
    05: 1800... something is seriously wrong.
    06: 3250 (Average value of G1S is 3800 ish).

    I already removed all the bloatware, ran optimizations on the system and disabled most start up things through msconfig. So yeah, the performance on 05 was absolutely horrifying. 06 was way below average too.
     
  4. Jalf

    Jalf Comrade Santa

    Reputations:
    2,883
    Messages:
    3,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    What, you think the card decides specifically to lower performance?

    Sounds a bit unlikely to me. The reason it uses shared memory is that it's better than no memory at all.

    Also, 3d Mark is not a reliable measure of performance.
     
  5. hlcc

    hlcc Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    113
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    you updated forceware yet?
     
  6. Avid Gamer

    Avid Gamer Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    253
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30