The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Mafi II PhysX

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Pluberus, May 28, 2010.

  1. Pluberus

    Pluberus Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    182
    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    30
  2. maksin01

    maksin01 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    446
    Messages:
    1,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Can't wait to play it! :D Don't really care about the PhysX stuff coz my new desktop has an ATI card.. The game's gonna be awesome especially since Godfather II sucked imo.
     
  3. Idyllic

    Idyllic Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    15
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    This game has been in the making for ages. And the graphics look a bit dated already imo.
     
  4. ziddy123

    ziddy123 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    954
    Messages:
    2,805
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    General consensus from gamers I read think wasn't a good choice to physx, the physics doesn't look realistic. I have to agree, physics looks kinda poor and the developer saying how it's amazing for total environment is pretty hilarious, to me that should be the standard for a blockbuster game now.

    General consensis is Nvidia forced them to use PhysX or something like that and they should have used Bullet/Havok instead.
    - GTA IV uses Bullet/Euphoria
    - BC2 uses modified Havok
    - Star Wars Unleashed uses Havok/Euphoria
    - Bioshock uses Havok
    - Halo 3 uses Havok
    - Valve uses modified Havok

    The most recent bigshot PhysX game is Metro 2033 and even Nvidia users admit runs pretty garbage considering the game is one giant marketing tool for Nvidia.
     
  5. AndroidVageta

    AndroidVageta Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    43
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Yeah it is a big marketing scam...look at things like Just Cause 2 for example...turning on the "CUDA" water in the oceans makes the water swell and wave...claiming to be something needing advanced physics to run...yet it looks and acts just like Crysis water...nothing special about it at all. All nVidia does it make this bullsh!t to get people to be all "ooo that looks pretty" when in most cases its something that could easily be doable on the CPU through software...Mafia II being a perfect example of a game that doesnt need Physx in order to do what its doing...plus, it really does look damn fake...especially the glass tiles/blocks...what the hell is that? LOL!
     
  6. nhat2991

    nhat2991 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    54
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    So are you saying, nvidia sucks because they can't match something that was being perfect for what, 10 years. Come on! Give em time!
     
  7. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Nvidia bought Ageia 2 years ago. People are complaining that Nvidia can't deliver the same or better experience with dedicated hardware and technology that others can do with just software. Which is entirely justifiable.