The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Microsoft introduces a new installer format that could mean big changes for Win32 and UWP

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by wyvernV2, Mar 8, 2018.

  1. wyvernV2

    wyvernV2 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    177
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    386
    Trophy Points:
    76
    "MSIX: One installer to rule them all."

    "During its Developer Day event today, Microsoft announced a new installer format for packaging apps called MSIX. It's essentially a brand new type of container, and what's neat about this one is that it supports all types of Windows applications, including Universal Windows Program (UWP) apps and classic Win32 programs.

    MSIX could conceivably get Win32 programs into the Windows Store without having them become UWP apps, and hopefully points at a long-needed rework of the Windows Store to make it, well, less terrible. We don't know just yet if that's a route Microsoft is going to take. All we really know at this early stage is that it will be supported in the Microsoft Store.






    Another key thing we don't know yet: how MSIX will compare to UWP, and whether it solves the many criticisms we (and Tim Sweeney) have had of the Universal Windows Platform. On the bright side, there's some transparency with MSIX: Microsoft is making the new container open source. There's already an SDK available on Github for developers to mess around with. In the description, Microsoft notes that MSIX enables developers on a variety of platforms to pack and unpack packages to be distributed from either the Microsoft Store or their own custom content distribution networks.

    The transition to MSIX won't happen overnight, even assuming we see widespread adoption. The new container could pave the way for a nice reduction in the number of installers and containers on Windows. We'll follow up with more on MSIX as we learn more."


    [​IMG]
     
    wyvernV2, Mar 8, 2018
    #1
    Vasudev likes this.
  2. thegh0sts

    thegh0sts Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    949
    Messages:
    7,700
    Likes Received:
    2,819
    Trophy Points:
    331
    that doesn't sound too bad but will have to watch this space for developments.
     
    thegh0sts, Mar 9, 2018
    #2
    wyvernV2 and Vasudev like this.
  3. Apollo13

    Apollo13 100% 16:10 Screens

    Reputations:
    1,432
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    81
    I thought there was already a way to distribute Win32 applications through the Windows Store, via Project Centennial? Or is that only through the Desktop App Converter? Would this remove some of the limitations that the conversion currently requires? For example, I'm guessing I probably couldn't use my hex editor to write to the memory of other processes if it had been run through the Desktop App Converter - but would an MSIX version of it potentially allow that?

    Probably a question 98% of people wouldn't care about, but I am that weirdo who has purposely and intentionally used that feature of my hex editor.
     
    Apollo13, Apr 5, 2018
    #3