The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    New GTX 680M world record overclock!

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Cloudfire, Aug 29, 2012.

  1. x32993x

    x32993x Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    124
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's fake. If it was real it would be posted on 3dmarks site
     
    x32993x, Nov 8, 2012
    #51
  2. jaug1337

    jaug1337 de_dust2

    Reputations:
    2,135
    Messages:
    4,862
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    Trophy Points:
    231
    He never posts links just screenshots, even with real stock benches... who knows though
     
    jaug1337, Nov 8, 2012
    #52
  3. Defengar

    Defengar Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    250
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Sli/cs will not double performance. Depending on the game/test you likely to get a 40-70% boost, there are also things tests won't show. A single 680m won't be very good in 5 years. A desktop rocking sli 690's (essentially 4 desktop 680's) will still be able to demolish any game on the market.
     
    Defengar, Nov 8, 2012
    #53
  4. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Assuming there's not a new API in the next 5 years where likely DX12 will be in full swing by then. Of course it will have to suffice with DX11.

    If history is any indication, 5 years ago we had 8800 GTS desktop card as top of the line. Four of those today probably wouldn't even equal the performance of the 680m. Here's 8800 GTS SLI 3DMark Vantage: http://img709.imageshack.us/img709/3256/vantageoc.jpg
    http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1755467
     
    HTWingNut, Nov 8, 2012
    #54
  5. Defengar

    Defengar Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    250
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    41
    was the 8800 GTS a dual card card though?
     
    Defengar, Nov 12, 2012
    #55
  6. evoler9500

    evoler9500 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    1250MHz? :confused:
     
    evoler9500, Nov 12, 2012
    #56
  7. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    If you notice I said "FOUR" of those wouldn't equal a 680m today.
     
    HTWingNut, Nov 13, 2012
    #57
  8. mitsuhide

    mitsuhide Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    109
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Wesley-Alex did the GTX 680M SLI WR?


    3920XM @ 2900MHZ
    GTX 680M SLI @ 719MHZ / 900MHZ
    3DMark11 : P10454
    link:
    http://benyouhuifile.it168.com/forum/201210/23/103418c94q4674f92k8982.jpg



    3920XM @ 2900MHZ
    GTX 680M SLI @ 985MHZ / 1200MHZ
    3DMark11 : P12159
    link:
    http://benyouhuifile.it168.com/forum/201210/23/105847a9mac9bfub88zo8f.jpg

    3920XM @ 4400MHZ
    GTX 680M SLI @ 1080MHZ / 1200MHZ
    3DMark11 : P14991
    link:
    http://benyouhuifile.it168.com/forum/201210/23/103408aksz3s3aoeoox9jj.jpg


    3920XM @ 5000MHZ
    GTX 680M SLI @ 1200MHZ / 1200MHZ
    3DMark11 : P17012
    link:
    http://benyouhuifile.it168.com/forum/201210/23/103426k87o7pwkwb7b048w.jpg



    thread link:
    http://dell.benyouhui.it168.com/thread-2608573-1-1.html
     
    mitsuhide, Nov 18, 2012
    #58
  9. sponge_gto

    sponge_gto Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    885
    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    307
    Trophy Points:
    76
    sponge_gto, Nov 18, 2012
    #59
  10. cj_miranda23

    cj_miranda23 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    334
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    537
    Trophy Points:
    106
    wow that score is equivalent to a 690 gtx desktop gpu score.
     
    cj_miranda23, Nov 19, 2012
    #60
  11. Prema

    Prema Your Freedom, Your Choice

    Reputations:
    9,368
    Messages:
    6,297
    Likes Received:
    16,485
    Trophy Points:
    681
    So 1.1750v, who made that vBios for him? :rolleyes:
     
    Prema, Nov 19, 2012
    #61
  12. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Guys... seriously. This thread is so unnecessary, it's all fake.
     
    svl7, Nov 19, 2012
    #62
  13. jaug1337

    jaug1337 de_dust2

    Reputations:
    2,135
    Messages:
    4,862
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Yeah it seems insanely fishy...
     
    jaug1337, Nov 19, 2012
    #63
  14. sh0gunshin

    sh0gunshin Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    if you he has the cracked version of 3dmark11 (and i'm assuming he does cus his is professional [$1 grand anyone?]) then he would want to turn off posting his scores online for cracked security purposes
     
    sh0gunshin, Nov 20, 2012
    #64
  15. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    If you're pushing the limits of high end hardware why not fork over the $20 for the "advanced" version? I mean seriously. $800 video card and can't pony up $20 to make it legit? Sorry. It's like going for the world record in anything, and being too stupid to at least have a few reputable witnesses and video. Hell, even if he had video taped the run it'd hold a lot more credence than this hogwash.
     
    HTWingNut, Nov 21, 2012
    #65
  16. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131
    ^ This.

    And besides, even the free version of 3dMark11 gives you valid verification links. Everyone familiar with the benching scene knows what kind of versification is required for benchmark runs, especially if you claim to be the worlds fastest.
     
    svl7, Nov 21, 2012
    #66
  17. sangemaru

    sangemaru Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    758
    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    101
    I'll trust svl7's opinion over some chinese guy any day.
    And seriously now, common logic dictates that if the same core from the desktop version doesn't reach those speeds at that voltage, there's no justification for the mobile version doing it.
     
    sangemaru, Nov 28, 2012
    #67
  18. timehacker

    timehacker Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    timehacker, Nov 28, 2012
    #68
  19. 5482741

    5482741 5482741

    Reputations:
    712
    Messages:
    1,530
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    56
    5482741, Dec 13, 2012
    #69
  20. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131

    That's a glitch in 3dMark11 and not a valid result, check test 4 - 153038.92 FPS
    Please use some common sense.


    And about the runs posted in the first post, they're all fake. Easy to prove, just recalculate the score manually. E.g. if you look at the test results for graphics test 1-4 and calculate the GPU score with those numbers, you get P11622 and not P10973,
    The picture is photoshopped an merged with some other screenshots. The numbers don't match at all.

    Stop getting fooled by such numbers, especially when they come without ANY proof, and don't believe anything that a pathetic liar like that 'Wesley-Alex' says.
     
    svl7, Dec 13, 2012
    #70
  21. 5482741

    5482741 5482741

    Reputations:
    712
    Messages:
    1,530
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I think you misinterpreted that post.

    I said my test crashed, so of course I don't think it was a valid result.

    I just thought I should post it before someone notices it in the Futuremark database and thinks that it somehow helps validate the fake score that this thread is about.


    The smiley rolling its eyes and quotes around the word "record" were also supposed to be indicators of sarcasm.
     
    5482741, Dec 13, 2012
    #71
  22. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131

    Ah, I see. My bad. :)
     
    svl7, Dec 13, 2012
    #72
  23. sangemaru

    sangemaru Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    758
    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Hey svl? Kinda off-topic, but what CPU scores do you get on that 920xm in 3dmark? I'd read one post from a guy that had apparently gotten around 7k. I can't go over 5.6k, and was wondering if there's a way. I saw that you'd gotten 5.5 at what appeared to be stock clocks (i might have read wrong), so how far'd you get during OC?
     
    sangemaru, Dec 13, 2012
    #73
  24. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131

    5.5k is about stock with the 920xm in the M15x, yes. By using Throttlestop you can get about P7450 in the CPU test. Here's my best benchmark with the M15x: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel(R) Core(TM) CPU X 920 @ 2.00GHz,Alienware score: P8464 3DMarks
    CPU could be slightly better in this run, but it's still a nice score I'd say :)

    If you want to get even more you'd need to increase the CPU voltage.
     
    svl7, Dec 13, 2012
    #74
  25. pau1ow

    pau1ow Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,336
    Messages:
    1,181
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Stop showing off dude!
     
    pau1ow, Dec 14, 2012
    #75
  26. Johnksss

    Johnksss .

    Reputations:
    11,536
    Messages:
    19,462
    Likes Received:
    12,847
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Going to have call then fake as well. When making world records, you tend to try to get them verified by the over clocking community, which he never ever does. So i'll keep claiming the title till that day happens... :)
    And he would need to run Vantage as well. Its pretty hard to fool vantage with shader trickery and nv control panel tweaking.
     
    Johnksss, Dec 27, 2012
    #76
← Previous page