The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Nvidia 9300M

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Jayayess1190, Jan 15, 2008.

  1. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
  2. Tony_A

    Tony_A Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    67
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Is it just me, or is the whole Nvidia 9XXX series a letdown? It seems to be nothing more than renamed 8XXX series cores.

    (For example, the 9500M is a G84 core,...basically a renamed 8600M)
     
  3. Beatsiz

    Beatsiz Life Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    95
    Messages:
    1,411
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    !?!?! "Lower end"

    I am confused why Nvidia is releasing these news things about 9500M and 9300M which all sound so great but in reality its like... WTH!?
     
  4. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Compared to an 8600, 8800, 9500, 9600, 9800 it is a "lower end" card. Just an upgrade from the 8300/8400 and will give you a smaller graphics card with a little more performance and battery life.
     
  5. zipx2k5

    zipx2k5 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    12
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    It isn't just you...it seems to me like Nvidia's transition from the 8 to 9 series is almost equivalent to the transition ATI made from the HD 2 series to the HD 3. Seems to be just re-labled die shrank versions of the 8 series. I'm guessing the 9600mGT will be a smaller 8600mGT clocked at 8700m-ish speeds.
     
  6. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Nope, the 9600 & 9800 will be based on the G92 and are supposed to be DX10.1 (wich the 9300/400/500 aren't)
     
  7. vshade

    vshade Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    35
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    More like the ati transition from x1000 series to x2000 series(not hd 2000), and the g92 is the 8800 gt
     
  8. Beatsiz

    Beatsiz Life Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    95
    Messages:
    1,411
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Ok... so why didnt they just rename them 8300 and or 8450 ?

    Dx10.1 ... just so... I get this... right...

    9800M gtx ? when!? see now im intriged again lol
     
  9. m_hael

    m_hael Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    they name the cards to make them sell whilst maintaining some incremental indication... other than that there is no rhyme or reason.
     
  10. link1313

    link1313 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I kind of will be disappointed as well if all nvidia does is follow ati's route and do a die shrink + DX10.1 and call it next generation -.-
     
  11. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    I think ATI sort of forces them to do it to stay competitive. It really hurts everyone.

    There should be a 3rd gpu maker.

    Intel doesn't count.
     
  12. jaslyn

    jaslyn Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The 9600 is great news for mid-range users though. Really hope the mobile version performs up to expectations. :p
     
  13. Daedelus

    Daedelus Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Especially if it has a 256bit-bus like the desktop version has!!
     
  14. benx009

    benx009 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    184
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    heck yeah! is nvidia really coming out with 256-bit buses for the 9xxxM series though???
     
  15. 000022

    000022 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    20
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Who knows? but I'm keeping my hopes up on 9600m, to upgrade from this 8600m GDDR2 bull****. I'd be out killing a kitten if the 9600m would work perfectly on my Acer 5920
     
  16. Dreidel

    Dreidel Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    144
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    ya i'm too lazy to find the article but the 9600m will be 256bit and will support dx10.1. imo its gonna be a great bang/buck card
     
  17. RyanHurtt

    RyanHurtt Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    42
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yea...if the 9300M isn't increased from 64-bit to 128-bit then this really is disappointing.

    The increase of battery isn't really a big deal as I can already pull in 4+ hours on my SZ6 with the battery under speed mode.

    This really just looks like ATI and nVidia convincing people that DX10.1 is something that we can't live without. :rolleyes:
     
  18. eteri

    eteri Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    what is the difference in performance and battery life between the 9300 and 8400?

    thnx
     
  19. link1313

    link1313 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Oh good, hopefully it will be 256-bit. That at least will make it worth it over the 8M series.
     
  20. naticus

    naticus Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    630
    Messages:
    1,767
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    wont outperdorm the 8800m, sorry, it will no more than an higher clocked 8700 which is about 2.5 X weaker than the 8800m, but keep those hopes up. :D
     
  21. unknown555525

    unknown555525 rawr

    Reputations:
    451
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55

    O m G

    I've said this enough times by now.

    Nvidia IS NOT jumping to DX10.1, they have already made a public statement saying that they will skip DX10.1, and focus purely on DX10, but will be making a product for DX10.2 when that time comes.

    So don't accuse Nvidia of forcing people to jump onto DX10.1 just because it's new when Nvidia won't even be supporting it.
     
  22. silentnite2608

    silentnite2608 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
  23. narsnail

    narsnail Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,045
    Messages:
    4,461
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    well they cant just die shrink the higher end cards, they will have to come out with somethingc alot more powerful cuzz they allready have the die shrink.

    and DX10.1 is nothing at all, not even worth being considered.
     
  24. 000022

    000022 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    20
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    9600m = dieshrink of a slightly more powerful 8700m GT? Let's hope everyone keeps up with the mxm mentality and make the mid-end card a mxm type 2