Just putting my 2 cents here for all the people that are overclocking their 8600m GT.
With these drivers i can get an extra 20 MHz out of my memory, (from 480 to 500) totally stable without artifacts of any kind. I read these drivers where really stable but i didn't believe they where these good.
I'd really recommend them. I've used both 169.04 and 171.16 and couldn't get more than 600 core 480 mem.
-
Yep these rock. Specially for my OC'd 8600 GDDR3
-
Yeah, 174.74 driver’s pretty good. I recently tried 174.82 drivers and it was very unstable while overclocked.
-
Hey guys, using the same drivers here but need some simple advice. How are you guys finding your safe clocks? I've had weird problems trying to OC' my 8600 M GT with Rivatuner when Oc'ing to like 550/700 I get a perfectly fine screen, until 15minutes, and then the artifacts go absolutely nuts.
Also tried ATITool, and when I try to find my max core it goes up to like 1400 mhz, with no artifacts so I thought it was unreliable....
Any Advice? -
174.74 is the best driver atm.
-
Would I be able to use it for Geforce 9500m GS, Vista 32bit? Or should I say is it okay? I see it's supported, but I'm not sure if it would have the same effect as you guys, also if there is any problems. AND If it's worth updating to it if I'm not going to overclock it. Thanks to whoever can give some insight.
-
The 9500M GS is the same card as the 8600M GT
-
I don't understand.
-
-
-
Well thanks you two, I LEARNED SOMETHING! -
In other words, the smaller the transistors get, the more efficient and powerful components become. In the case of the two versions of the 8600GT (also the 9500GS?), the differences in die process mean that the 9500GS will generate a little less heat and use a little less power. -
I understand how it would become more energy efficient, but how so more powerful?
Thanks for the write up! -
The idea is that when you go to a smaller die process, you can put millions of extra transistors in the extra area left over from the die shrink. More transistors = more performance.
Think of it this way, the original Pentium 1 processors were manufactuered using an 800 nanometer process that packed 3.1 million transistors onto a single core in a chip at 66Mhz.
A modern Core 2 Duo from Intel (Penryn line) is manufactured using a 45 nanometer process that packs around 410 million transistors at anything from 2.5 to 3.2 GHz on 2 cores.
So, in other words, all those extra transistors made smaller are why we are playing Crysis instead of Quake 1. -
I get it now
Thanks heaps man.
EDIT: I've run out of rep >.< -
I just installed version 174.31 on my Vostro 1700 with a 256MB 8600M GT card installed. Any other benefits to these drivers if you don't plan on overclocking the card, which I won't do?
-
Yeah, I went from 174.31 to 174.74 then back to 174.31 just because it's digitally signed and I don't notice any advantage with the 174.74 over the 174.31. They both seem to give same performance, but my understanding is that the 174.31 is specifically for notebooks. I have a Toshiba x205 sli1 and my 3dmark06 scores seem to be better with 174.31 (7255 stock clocks) as opposed to (7129 stock clocks) for 174.74. Haven't tested overclocking though.
If .74 is better than .31 please explain to me how and I'll go back to those. Thanks -
Hi there. Where did you get your drivers from?
-
LaptopVideo2Go. There is some instructions on the website on how to install the driver since it is not made for Laptop Cards.
http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/ - Check out the community Forum. -
Thought so, cant get them to install on my pc
(even with the modded infs)
-
ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer
About die shrinks:
A common trend I have noticed for years thru personal experience in why 2 identical components in specs besides the die shrink perform differently.
As stated above the newer model with the shrink will be more energy efficient thus less power used and less heat generated.
So stock they are or should be the same, however I have noticed that almost always the new model with the shrink can overclock higher/better. This means more performance for an enthusiast who is willing to overclock and thus why I could say it has higher performance if you were to ask me. -
So far all i get is stuttering >.<
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
i cant oc it with my 8600m gs ddr2
-
Ah my mistake, misread the instructions
Still can't OC my 8800 with rivatuner though lol.
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
what driver are u using
-
Has anyone used this driver with a 8400M GS? the best so far for me is the 158.45 , but i want to try this new ones..
-
same here... i have a 8600mGT ddr2...
can any1 confirm if these are stable drivers.. no overclocking for me... just if they are stable and increase a bit of a performance..
thanks people! -
-
fyi, 174.74 drivers come with manufacturer INFs.
It is worth your time to find the right INF.
Even as good as the LV2G INF is, it is no match for the manufacturer one.
x205 users should be using the nvco.inf
Those of you who do not have x205s, look at your original driver set and find the inf... then find the one that matches! -
should i try to overclock my 8600 gt ? its not ddr2. Also ill be getting the new drivers today when i get home from college .
-
Is powermizer still enabled for the 174.74?
-
It sounds good but my T61p has had no problems with the 174.31 drivers. Have had them for about 4 weeks now.
Seems to play everything so far and even improved my 3Dmark06 score. -
-
-
Btw, what of those new series are laptop-specific? Mine 8400 always gets too hot with desktop drivers, but runs cool with the lapt-spec..
-
thought Id post again saying downgrading to 174.31 got rid of stuttering with 8600m GT DDR2 and DDR3 card ( tested with 2 computers mine and a MBP)
-
-
I uninstalled the newest drivers then tried these, talk about a big difference in Assasins Creed! Very nice
-
I can't seem to find the driver on the alptopvideo2go site. can someone point me in the right direction. thanks
-
Is this 174.74 driver better than the newer 174.82 driver ?
-
I tried .74 and they are worse than .31 , the ones I`m using right now. Might be just my 7950GTX getting old on me...
-
I installed the 174.74 driver for my 8600gt w/ddr3 and it actually lowered my windows experience index from a 4.8 to a rock bottom 1. I went from a 169.25 to the 174.74 and I know I installed it correctly. I didn't overclock my 8600.
Anyone know why I get such horrible performance ratings with the 174.74?
edit: nevermind, I installed the XP version by accident -
Will the modded inf for the 174.31 support my IFL90's 8600mGT ddr2?
-
-
This driver is definitely top notch. I was able to push my memory clocks another five points, with stability.
I've finally found a replacement for 171.16, which I never thought I'd upgrade from. 174.31 caused too many graphical glitches for my liking. -
This driver is odd, I decided to use the original inf for Dell laptops (nvdm.inf) instead of the modded inf and the installation went fine but this driver shows up as non-WHQL certified! I thought this being an Nvidia WHQL release with 40+ modded infs that using an original inf meant for my laptop was not going to be a problem?
-
-
Thanks for that, I guess the WHQL is only for desktop nvidia owners. At least the driver works fine so far.
-
Hello,
I have just installed this driver from laptopvideo2go and updated my windows experience index. It bumped the graphics section up by 0.2 points from 4.4 to 4.6.
Now I know the WEI is somewhat poor as a performance indicator to see that improvement by just changing a driver... Im impressed. -
Couple questions if I may...
First off, I am NOT a graphics and OC guy so I'm relatively lost here (please keep that between us).
I have the 174.74 in my M1330 with a 8400GS. Can I OC it? If so, will it give me alot of improvement in my graphics scoring?
next, and i know someones gonna yell at me but, is it hard? Can it be done by a common person such as I?
Nvidia driver 174.74 is awesome!
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by leo_s, Apr 13, 2008.