I'm about to buy the new toshiba Qosmio F55 and they have this card.
PCI-Express x16 graphics subsystem, featuring:
o
NVIDIA® GeForce® 9700M GTS, 512MB GDDR3 discrete graphics memory, plus up to 1791MB dynamically allocated shared graphics memory using NVIDIA® TurboCache technology.
o
Total Available Graphics memory 2303MB (64-bit version)
My question:
I heard that the shared part will negatively affect the laptop, is that true?
If it is true is there a way to remove it or stop it?
Anyway i think the 512 is more than enough, can't i just remove that part??
Sorry i 'm new to these things
-
I believe this card is 256bit, which it means it can utilize 512mb of VRam efficiently. As for "shared", it won't have negative effects, but it won't show positive effects either.
-
DOes the shared thing take from the RAMs?
-
It will "dynamically", meaning it won't rob RAM from you when it's needed, but it will "borrow" from it if the VRam is running dry. (Highly unlikely)
You are fine. -
i never seen that actually happen, but if it would where else can it take it from ?
-
Thanks a lot for your fast answers
-
"Turbocache" will dynamically borrow memory from physical RAM when needed. Like Royk said, it is very rare it is needed, especially in higher-end cards. Now, 64bit 64mb cards will effectively use Turbocache, as 64mb is a little low these days.
-
how much is the toshiba qosmio?
-
I think 9700m GTS is actually 128bit, not sure tho.
-
first is $1399.99
http://explore.toshiba.com/laptops/qosmio/F50/F55-Q502
The other is $1749.99:
http://explore.toshiba.com/laptops/qosmio/F50/F55-Q503 -
-
not bad price points at all..... that x305 qosmio is so gaudy in that red IMO but its not a bad deal
-
The 9700m gts is 256 bit.
-
oh here we go:
-
Jeez I'm sick of this Nvidia thing. I thought the 9600m GT was the highest 128bit.
This 9 series is extremely annoying... -
I would go with the cheaper model also, I don't see 449$ worth of upgrades.
-
The NVIDIA® GeForce® 9700M GTS is 256 bit
http://www.guru3d.com/news/nvidia-intros-geforce-9700m-9800m-video/ -
The GTS has a 256 bit bus and 48 stream cpu's. Depending on what clocks it has it will be somewhat less powerfull than the 8800m GTS.
This is actually a new card.. Well done Nvidia -
Is it an irony or sth?
Does it mean it is not a good card?
Sorry i don't know much about graphics cards -
If you are asking, and not making fun of me, then yes it is a very good card! It should play any new game for 2-3 years
-
loool no....i thought you are making fun of the card
as i said i don't know much about them
I was confused when you said less powerful -
Peter Bazooka Notebook Evangelist
According to this report the 9700M GTS is 256-bit and has 48 shaders versus the usual 32 found in most mid-range Nvidia cards.
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=8585&Itemid=1
That article also shows the 9700M gt as being 256-bit which would make sense considering Nvidia has so-far labeled it as an enthusiast card. But looking at its theoretical bandwidth it appears 128-bit though...
http://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_m_series.html -
EDIT: Woops didn't see second page. 9700M GT is a 128bit G96, but with a high core/shader clock. It probably has a "dual rank" 128bit bus like the 8700M GT. There's still a possibility that it comes with GDDR3 2400 so it would have almost as much bandwidth as the other 256bits mobile cards but I doubt that kind of clock is possible on a laptop -
Toshiba Qosmios are known to be overpriced monsters. Moreover although they are 17 inch models, they don't give you a full sized keyboard which is really sad. My first experience with a Toshiba satellite ended in disaster. Their service was simply horrible. I wonder if they have changed now.
-
-
I'd wait for an official review before jumping the gun, honestly, where do these companies come up with these prices?:twitcy:
-
ummm... that f55 in linked here:
http://explore.toshiba.com/laptops/qosmio/F50/F55-Q503
has a 9700m gts...
but the screen is only a 1440x900 -
Can order the bestbuy version now. If this laptop goes on sale, I will definitely be looking further into purchasing one.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage...osmio&lp=2&type=product&cp=1&id=1212192365350 -
howard911s Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer
I have Gateway P6860FX stock, but also purchased the Toshiba F55 becauase I'll be going back to school and gateway 10 pounds is impossible to lug around... but I have concern on the heat and noise, so toshiba is just in box sitting in my room.. not sure to open it or not yet..
-
Compared to the Sony I had before and the many Dells which pass through here I am not one bit sorry I went with this Toshiba.
To be fair, I haven't had to have anything replaced or fixed and the only support I have required is driver support which has been adequate with everything else but GPU updates. (Dell and Sony were the same or worse)
I would definitely purchase Toshiba again at least for now and the F55 (15") and the x305 (17") models are definitely interesting. -
How does the 9700m GTS compare to the previous generation 8800m GTS? Notebookcheck says the 9700m is better, but then again, it's notebookcheck...
-
Should be a bit worse, with it's lack of Unified Shaders. Though, it is a 256bit card, which is nice.
-
-
Still can't imagine it having 16 less US's and being as powerful.
Must be a super chip. -
9600GT has 32 less than the GTS 640 -
Hmm... we'll see, I guess.
Never know, you may be right. -
They have the 9800M GTS outperforming the 8800M GTX, which I don't see happening at all, considering the 9800M GT performs at the same level with 32 more SP's.
And besides, we have the X305 benches on 1280 x 800 for the 9700M GTS. It doesn't look like it's outperforming the 8800M GTS. Very close though.
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=3687429&postcount=43
For comparison, the stock FX tends to score around 7600-7800 with a 1.83 Ghz C2D, compared to the P7350, a 2.0 Montevina C2D. -
Is the P7350 likely to be a bottleneck for the 9700m GTS?
-
-
As this would mean that the 9800M GTS would also outperform the 9800M GT, which I don't think is likely. -
Yah, I'm sure its not as good as 8800m gtx, but it should at least beat the old 8800m gts.
-
-
could someone post the result of 3dmark 06 of the f55 here?
-
In case you missed it.
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=3687429&postcount=43 -
thnx for the quick reply - seems like the 9700m gts rocks ;D
did u already fill up the second hdd slot? if so, was it possible to get them to work in a raid-0 array? -
Note that it's run in 1280 x 800, which isn't standard resolution. It also seems substantially higher than the other poster who posted results with the same machine. The other user got a 7334, I suspect that might be on 1280 x 854, but the other user hasn't responded yet. Nonethless, a 1000 points in 3dmark06 difference is rather odd.
From the original X305 thread, it was mentioned that you needed to purchase an extra caddy for the second HDD. -
http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-9700M-GTS.9899.0.html -
-
Interesting this kind of shows or seems to tell me that the new 9700M GTS is about the same or a little better than my 8800M GTS in my Gateway P-6860FX. Comparing the 3DMark2006 scores my Gateway scored 8965 but that was with an Intel X9000 Extreme CPU running at 3.0Ghz, where as the Toshiba X305 is using the stock P7350 @ 2.0Ghz. As we all know CPU does help a little on the overall 3DMark2006 score. I compared the average FPS of both the X305 and my P-6860FX and they are basically even, actually the X305 slightly beats my P-6860FX by .5 or 1 FPS. With a stronger processor, I believe the X305 would gain probably 3-4 FPS. What you have now with the X305 is the power of the Gateway P-6860FX in a smaller 15.4" package. Anyways just my oberservation. God Bless
-
Yeah sorry bout that I was at work so i couldn't check my information. But yeah i ran my 3dMark06 1280 X 800 which is what it defaulted to
http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff209/azianai/bench.jpg
Nvidia geforce 9700M GTS
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Batr, Jul 26, 2008.